EXPOSING HIDDEN TRUTHS
SCOTUS
Kelo vs Town of New London, Ct.
21 years ago, in a disgusting abuse of power, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision for eminent domain to seize property for private use & got a major ruling wrong in 2005.
In some circles it is known as the ruling against the little pink house, but it goes much deeper than that.
READ MORE HERE:
https://share.google/
Wisconsin legislatures were so appalled by the 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling they later created & passed AB657 in 2006 and the law for Wisconsin property owners were enhanced.
Or so they thought.
ATC
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that the government can use eminent domain to seize private residential property and transfer it to private commercial developers for "economic development".
Critics, dissenting justices, and the public found several major flaws with the decision:
Expansion of "Public Use":
• Bending the Constitution: The Fifth Amendment allows private property to be taken only for "public use" (such as building a road, school, or military base). The majority redefined "public use" to mean "public purpose" or indirect economic benefits like increased tax revenue and job creation.
• Transfer to Private Parties: It permitted the government to take land from one private owner (like Susette Kelo) and hand it over to another private corporation or non-profit developer.
• Vulnerability of Homeowners: As Justice Sandra Day O’Connor warned in her dissent, the ruling left virtually any ordinary person's home or small business vulnerable to being seized if a developer could convince the city they could generate more tax money.
Failure of the Project
• Unfulfilled Promises: The city condemned and bulldozed the Fort Trumbull neighborhood to make way for a upscale complex tied to a Pfizer facility.
• Vacant Land: The promised economic boom never materialized. Pfizer later closed its local facility, and the seized land sat as an empty, undeveloped lot for nearly 20 years.
Nationwide Backlash and Reform:
• Bipartisan Condemnation: The decision triggered massive political and public outrage from across the political spectrum, uniting groups from the libertarian Institute for Justice to the NAACP and AARP.
• State-Level Pushback: In response, the vast majority of states passed legislation or amended their state constitutions to ban or restrict the use of eminent domain for private economic development.
ATC has trampled the property rights of Sara Rosenthal, Racine Circuit Court Case # 26CV324, read more here:
In fact, I believe actors for ATC has committed crimes to try to secure private property from Ms. Rosenthal contrary to AB657.
ATC in my mind is a hostile company.
We in Racine County have two separate property's that have seen the abuse by the Courts & corrupt lawyers to further erode the rights of the property owners & knowingly violate AB657.
ATC is repugnant to the constitution
as well as the courts, lawyers that trample property rights.
Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz
AKA Gagthebitch
Gagthebitch has another case that has caught my attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment