H

HIDDEN TRUTHS

Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine

Court of Appeals case # 2018AP001189

Which title do you prefer?

Judges Schmudges

or

Disorder in the Courts

Court of Appeals Chief Judge Lisa Neubauer continues her sick administration of Justice with abuse of the calendar against Appellant 
Sandy Weidner.

Judge Lisa "Legal Whore" Neubauer 

It will soon be 4 months since the court had the duty 

to calendar Weidner's appeal date. As of today there still is no court schedule on file to conduct hearings.

We remind the public that Chief Judge Lisa Neubauer had earlier illegally sealed the entire court record and engaged in criminal misconduct to the detriment of Sandra Weidner !

Neubauer as acting chief court of appeals judge in this case had violated Wisconsin Statutes 59.20(3), 757.14, the 1st. Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and 

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules.

So how can Neubauer and other criminals within our courts continue to flagrantly engage in misconduct in office without being sanctioned, censored, disciplined, criminally charged or removed from office?

The answer is simple.

The public doesn't hold government officials accountable. 

You the public are responsible for voting these criminals into government. Year after year the public elects these public serpents into office, so in essence most of you are getting what you deserve while the rest of us has to endure the ignorance of our fellow citizens. 

Sandy Weidner is one of our citizens who is enduring the pain of criminals in our courts and government.

   

Sandy Weidner

Sandy Weidner has fought the good fight for the betterment of our community, then to be trampled by corrupt government officials and corrupt courts. 

In Racine County Circuit Court, Sandy Weidner's rights were both denied and violated by Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, along with 5.8 million Wisconsin citizens.

Not to be outdone by a lower court, then Court of Appeals judge Lisa Neubauer also denied and violated the rights of 5.8 million Wisconsin citizens. 

So why hasn't Sandy Weidner's court case been calendared ?

Based on conjecture and speculation, Judge Neubauer is afraid that her 3 panel court of appeal peers may decide to 
overturn the outrageous rulings of  
judge Eugene "Gagthebitch" Gasiorkiewicz whom 
Lisa "Legal Whore" Neubauer was complicit with by 
sealing the entire court record.

Or perhaps the 3 panel court will hold Neubauer accountable 
of her crimes.  Naw, the black robe code will silence that.

 The answer is simple,
Lisa Neubauer is just evil.

Judge Eugene "gagthebitch" Gasiorkiewicz

We could go on and on and on but we won't.

We close with this.

"Gagthebitch" and "Legal Whore"  are a couple of corrupt judges made for hell.

What's upcoming on our radar?

Lots and lots

List of Racine Rats

State vs. Stephen Lambert

Party-ON the Promenade

Return to rightful owner the properties at Machinery Row

Public invited.
Hot Government meeting at Demark's Bar and Grill
1600 Albert street, Racine Wi.
(Corner of Albert and Memorial)
Wednesday 11-20-2019
Meeting starts at 7PM

Why a bar and grill?
Because no great story ever started with a salad !

DEMOCRACY DIES IN THE DARKNESS 
OF SECRET COURTS.

When it comes to bull****

Few are as full of **** as Judge Gagthebitch

Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz 

AKA

Judge Gagthebitch

Featuring
Judge Gasiorkiewicz's 
SECRET COURT

Racine County Circuit Court

Sandy J. Weidner vs. City of Racine

Case # 17CV1644

Racine County Circuit Court Judge Eugene Gagthebitch has been working extra hours to keep inquiring minds like us from overseeing what is going on in his court.

Gagthebitch sealed the WCCA files preventing citizens to review online court records, sealed the hearing dates, sealed the hearings, sealed the review of court information at the clerk's office, sealed the City's legal expenses and ordered everyone involved in the Sandy Weidner vs.City of Racine to keep quiet. 

SO WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? 
Everything in this secret court is sealed! 
Nothing to see here! Move along!

This is what happens when a judge thinks 

his middle name is GOD!

Early in this case, the judge had decided make make a public policy decision to completely seal the court proceedings. The complete court record was sealed including the docketing # and party names.

For months, all was going quite well and as planned in Judge Gasiorkiewicz court. Michael Cohen was representing the city of Racine racking up big billing hours.  Sandy Weidner legal efforts were brickwalled and ruled against time after time. 

How could anybody possibly now interfere with judge Gasiorkiewicz's pet secret court case?
The general public was clueless that the 
open records case even existed. These insane secret court proceedings went on for months in the darkness of Eugene Gasiorkiewicz's secret court without public scrutiny and oversight.  


 Then Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel reporter Bruce Vielmetti broke the case to the public. 

Soon afterwards contempt of court proceedings were brought against Sandy Weidner. A secret 9 A.M.contempt hearing on the 25th. of September was scheduled. This secret hearing was to quash any remaining fight out of her. 

Gagthebitch's deathstar contempt of court proceedings traps were well oiled, the attorneys palms were further greased, the kill was imminent and the vultures were waiting. 



Until.......  

until a pro se litigant and the collective news media independently  took action upon the court to intervene.

One could say a monkey wrench was thrown into court.

Now the case is in the public's eye.


 This is where reality hits judge Gasiorkiewicz
The dirty dealings of the Racine County Circuit Court system is once again exposed and its trail leads all the way to the complicit Appeals Court where judge Lisa Neubauer prominently sits.

Any legitimate Appeals court would have reviewed the case and immediately remanded this case back to the circuit court.

Instead Sandy Weidner is now fighting in the darkness of two complicit courts. 

The written record vs. the oral record 

Below are printed court documents of 

Racine County Circuit Court case # 17CV1644 

as of 9-24-2018 and the morning of the 

contempt hearing on 9-25-2018 

WCCA online record search using Case #

WCCA online record search using judge's schedule

Publicly posted at the courtroom door

The court could not have made it any more clear that the case is sealed and not open to the public.

 As of 7:31 am the court had publicly posted 

at the court room door the case is sealed.

These written court facts are both indisputable and irrefutable.

At 8:30 am the pro se litigant files his motion to intervene.

Shortly before 9am, the court staff cordially invited all the interested parties waiting at the door into the courtroom.  When the Judge entered the courtroom, he was noticeably upset.

Here is what judge Gasiorkiewicz stated orally in court on the morning of September 25th. 2018.

THE COURT: The Court never had an intent to

close the hearing on contempt today. I don't know where

that came from. I've seen it eluded to in a number of

articles that have been provided by Mr. Cohen.

I've seen it eluded to in the Racine Journal

Times as of this very date.

Say what?
We think the judge is choking gagging on his own words

How do you tell when a judge is lying?
When they move their lips !

Just like the Making of a Murderer subject Brendan Dassey 
Judge Gasiorkiewicz in his own words has subjected himself to prima facie evidence that he conspired and engaged in ethics violations by conspiring and failing to give public notice of court proceedings and hearings. 


Didn't judge Gasiorkiewicz just find Sandy Weidner guilty of contempt of court using prima facie evidence?

Karma is a bitch!
Thank you judge Gagthebitch

An ethics complaint is in the works!

Judges are never as powerful as they tell you they are. 

Citizens are never as meek as they think you are.

Resign now Gagthebitch! 

Sandy Weidner 

files as a write in candidate for

 Mayor of Racine

Sandy Weidner

On April 2nd. voters have a real opportunity to make a positive difference for the city of Racine by writing in 
Sandy Weidner for Mayor

VOTERS HAVE A REAL CHOICE

You can keep the darkness of

Cory Mason's Secret government

Cory Mason
Secret court proponent

Secret surveys, Secret meetings,

Secret government & Secret courts

OR
You can embrace the sunshine of 

HONEST, OPEN &TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENT

Sandy Weidner has been the steadfast voice of reason within the common council for nearly 20 years.

Put those 20 years of  integrity and experience to work for you, 

the people of Racine.

Sandy Weidner is

Honest, Open &Transparent 

Government

Click and view more at
https://www.hotgovernment.com/

UPDATED

WEIDNER CASE TO HAVE 

A CHANGE OF VENUE TO 
KENOSHA COUNTY

WELCOME TO MORE

COURTROOM HELL


Did you know that Racine County 
is hiring and interviewing Judges ?

Official Racine County Circuit Court 

Judicial Hiring Notice:

*QUALIFICATIONS*

ABILITY TO IGNORE THEIR OATH OF OFFICE

RULE ON EMOTION, NOT ON LAW

CONSIDER ALL ALLEGATIONS AS EVIDENCE

SUPPRESS THE TRUTH

SPINELESSLY HIDE BEHIND JUDICIAL IMMUNITY

TAKE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ALL LITIGANT'S ATTORNEYS

FAVOR THY PLAYERS WITHIN THE SYSTEM

FAVOR THY PARTY BEFORE COUNTRY
FOSTER CORRUPTION AND CONFLICT

MAINTAIN PAY TO PLAY SYSTEM AT ALL COST

QUASH PRO SE LITIGANTS

MAINTAIN BLACK ROBE CODE

Oops I'm sorry, most positions are already filled!

Weidner vs. City of Racine

2017CV001644

In the continuing courtroom saga of Weidner vs. City of Racine,

Sandy Weidner is being assigned yet another judge, this time outside of the ever corrupt Racine County Circuit Court system.

As quickly as Racine Judge Maureen Martinez was assigned 
"the case"

is as quickly she has recused herself from this

nationally embarrassing fiasco.

Sandy Weidner will now stand before Kenosha County Circuit Court judge Chad Kerkman.

For well over two years, Sandy Weidner has been abused by corrupt and malicious judges who violated and attacked both her rights and 

the rights of the public.

Early in during courtroom proceedings, the basic right to amend her case was denied by Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz(herein referred to as Gagthebitch) and the court declared all records sealed

concerning the case.

 Lawless Pagan Judge Gagthebitch violated numerous Wisconsin statutes while conducting court and acted in a most prejudice and criminal manner. His illegal and criminal acts while conducting court sent Sandy into the abyss and was the beginning of her journey into courtroom hell.

Justice is a precious commodity within the

Racine County Circuit Court System.

Perhaps Sandy will fare better in another jurisdiction

Racine County citizens should be outraged at our courts for unethical and criminal misconduct concerning this case and the feckless oversight agencies that turn a deaf ear and blind eye concerning 

the misconduct of our judges.

Be outraged!

https://channel22news.com/several-racine-county-employees-under-fire-for-forgery-tampering-with-public-records-and-misconduct-in-public-office/

Last Man Standing

Tonight history was made !

Councilwoman Sandy Weidner was the lone Alderman at city hall proudly performing her elected duties for the last time as the rest of the council, mayor, city attorney and city clerk cowered at home and participated in the common council meeting on the 
internet via Facebook.

For twenty years Sandy has been a voice of reason, often being the lone voice in opposing special interest and white elephant projects 

Tonight was also Sandy Weidner's last council meeting being an alderman as she sat alone in empty City Hall Chambers conducting common council business

See how the City of Racine has shut down for the month of April
https://cityofracine.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

What is more telling is if you search all departments to see committee meetings, you will determine that virtually no council business has been conducted.  Mayor Mason has declared himself King and does it all as the majority of the bobble heads in the common council blindly approve without staff or citizen input. 

Ironically, the last man standing is a woman.

But if you know Sandy, that should come as no surprise

When it comes to rating elected officials in Racine County, 

none stand as strong, wise or classy as City of Racine 

Alderman Sandy Weidner.

Thank you for your 20 years of exemplary public service !

We salute you Sandy Weidner 

#HOTGOVERNMENT

Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine

Racine County Circuit Court case #2017CV1644

Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz has announced the following thru his deputy court clerk Jamie Hardin:

The judge has "ordered counsel for the participating parties to review additional documents and will unseal or unseal with redactions all the documents within one week to 10 days of the hearing date"   {emphasis added}

According to this email we received from the court, we believe the full court record shall be made available to the public 

no later than 1-19-2019 and WCCA records will be posted for the general public to view. 

Although the legal fight isn't quite over yet, the burden and darkness of the secret court has finally been lifted from our brave public official Sandy Weidner.

RCC will continue to monitor this case, glean the records when made available by the court and act again if necessary to protect citizens rights.

 City of Racine residents are fortunate to have such a fine public servant as Sandy Weidner.

Sandy Weidner is Honest, Open, Transparent Government  

 #HOTGOVERNMENT 

is now here to serve you.

For more information, 
or to get involved

send your inquiries to

HOTGOVERNMENT@GMAIL.COM

Racine Circus Court case # 2017CV001644

Weidner Found Guilty of Contempt of Court
and
RCC finds the court in contempt of the public

Judge Gagthebitch during his final comments of today's court hearing called Weidner's case "the most egregious" example of contempt of court he's seen by a lawmaker. 

Gagthebitch further stated during the hearing;

"It is pure anarchy if people do not obey a court order," "That is the heart-blood of an orderly society."

In an honest court, all that the judge stated above would be accurate .

But Judge Gasiorkiewicz's court is not an honorable court.

If one blindly obeys an order of a corrupt and secret court
 then we may have tyranny

Think about this folks, it is the  
 irony and hypocrisy of an open records request morphing into a sealed court case that is strikingly counterintuitive to the very heart and soul of Wisconsin Public Record laws.

The preponderance of evidence of the Sept.25th sealed court hearing exposes the judge as a manipulative double talking scoundrel that begs for a forensic audit of this court case. 

Court transcripts along with supporting documents of the Sept.25th hearing posted in our Sept. 27th blog illuminates Judge Gagthebitch actively conspiring to deny Ms. Weidner the right of the public to attend the 
scheduled UNPOSTED hearing. 

The court's egregious conduct has knowingly put Ms. Weidner in a Catch 22 situation.  A situation of irrational circular reasoning to which there is no way out of the judges trap.  

The Catch 22
By violating the gag order, Ms Weidner allows the public to scrutinize the court, but doing so puts her in harm's way of contempt of court.  If she complies with the gag order she remains in a secret court subject 
to the wrath of tyranny.
Asserting her First amendment rights will benefit an informed public but in doing so risk additional fines and damage claims the court may assess.

There exist no rational reasoning to escape the circular conundrum.

This is an open records case.
 Only a complete fool or complicit judge would put a litigant into this position.  

. The judge has not only violated Ms. Weidner, the judge has conspired to violate every Wisconsin citizens rights to access public records and to court proceedings. 

Tyranny begins in secret courts, quashing one opponent at a time without the knowledge and scrutiny of the general public.
Secret courts are a cornerstone of tyranny.

Any sealed court case should be highly questioned and challenged by the general public. To leave your fellow citizen go it alone in a secret court is desertion of morals and ideals, thus creating ideal circumstances for evil to flourish.


This court plays very dirty.
Judge Gasiorkiewicz was put on notice before the Oct 3rd. hearing that he was derelict of his judicial responsibilities by failing to post public notice of the hearing. We at RCC assert the court knowingly failed to post notice of today's hearing and the Sept. 25th hearing.  Judge Gasiorkiewicz conspired and knowingly subverted Wisconsin laws to act against the rights of citizens. These judicial errors, acts and omissions are contrary to Wisconsin statutes and the Wisconsin constitution, in doing so the judge has violated his oath of office.

During the court hearing, Judge Gasiorkiewicz used prima facie evidence to hold Sandy Weidner in contempt of court. 

Holding Judge Gasiorkiewicz to the same prima facie standard, Judge Gasiorkiewicz is guilty of conspiring and acting to subvert Wisconsin statutes, the Wisconsin constitution and 
First Amendment rights. 

RCC calls for the resignation or removal of Judge Gasiorkiewicz for blatant errors, acts and omissions of his judicial duties.  

Today

We found Sandy Weidner acting as a patriot !

RACINE
JUDGE

GASIORKIEWICZ

GAG-THE-BITCH

EXPOSED 

Racine County Circuit Court 
case #2017CV001644
Sandy Weidner Vs. City of Racine
https://www.gofundme.com/help-alderman-fight-secret-court

A very troubling court case is currently working its way through the Racine County Circuit Court system involving our right to open records, free speech and the ability to seek redress with 
public discourse. We will get more into the case details shortly.

Judge Gasiorkiewicz was elected to office in 2010 and since has garnered many critics and detractors of his controversial decisions.
According to several attorney surveys, Judge Gasiorkiewicz was lowly rated by his legal peers.

Perhaps his most controversial case before him involved the token sentencing of a 4 month slap on the back in jail to scion billionaire Sam Curtis Johnson 3rd,  for sexual assault of a child.

Despite his controversy as judge for the last 8 years, it appeared nobody knew how to pronounce Gasiorkiewicz's name.

Problem solved with this open records court case.

This ugly legal case has revealed 
his appropriate phonic name.

Gagthebitch!

A name that will live for infamy.
This legal case is another low for the Racine County Circuit courts and is an inside attack on all Americans.  

For real journalism about this very dangerous court precedent, and to gain background information, click on the two hyperlinks provided below

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/secret-open-records-case-racine-seeks-sanctions-against-alderwoman/1410143002/

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/25/judge-delays-contempt-hearing-secret-racine-open-records-case/1421017002/





Back to the case.

 An active ongoing open records case has been sealed in the Racine County Circus Court System and has been appealed to the higher circus court where an apparent complicit Racine native, Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals Lisa Neubauer also determined to maintain a closed court to the public. We say complicit because even the names of the parties involved in this court case is sealed.

Sealing of public records is contrary to 
Wisconsin Statutes 19.31-39, 757.14 and the First Amendment of our U.S. Constitution, guaranteeing our following rights.    
1. Public assembly in a public courthouse and courtroom

2.      Right to free speech - including the right to listen to what is spoken.

3.      Right to petition government and seek redress with public discourse or argument in support of as such.

RCC asserts the circus courts are 
suppressing free and open debate 

by the arbitrary sealing of the records and as such is 

oppressing others in free speech issues.

Racine County Circus Court case # 2017CV001644

Sandy Weidner Vs. City of Racine

Sealed party Vs. Sealed party

 Racine County Circus Court 

The honorable Judge Gasiorkiewicz 

PRESIDING

AKA Judge Gag-the-bitch

We at RCC award Judge Gag-the-bitch the coveted 3 "C" plus "C" prize.
complicity-conspiracy-collusion+corruption

This case brings to mind the lyrics from the Tremeloes

Silence is golden
But my eyes still see
Silence is golden golden
But my eyes still see
Talking  is cheap people follow like sheep 
Even though there is no where to go
How could she tell he deceived her so well
Pity she'll be the last one to know

Enjoy the music while you 
continue to read

We at RCC did a quick forensic analysis of the following court transcripts and found things are not as they say.

Here are a few excerpts.

During the hearing did Attorney Cohen object 
to adjourn the hearing?
NO!   Judge Gag-the-bitch spoke for the defense attorney.

"I know that Mr. Cohen objects to that and has

cited that there has been additional dissemination of

information, which is at least theoretically subject to

the seal order in this matter made by Ms. Weidner."

During oral arguments of the hearing,
Judge Gag-the-bitch states that defense attorney Cohen objects to the adjournment without Mr. Cohen making 
such a verbal court record. 
But how did the judge know?
ex parte conversations?
Hand signals?
sign language?
 googly eyes?

Now for the court transcripts

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT RACINE COUNTY

Branch 2

---------------------------------------------------------------

SANDRA J. WEIDNER,

Plaintiff, MOTION

vs. Case No. 17-CV-1644

CITY OF RACINE,

Defendant.

---------------------------------------------------------------

HONORABLE EUGENE A. GASIORKIEWICZ

Judge Presiding

Date of Hearing:

September 25, 2018

Leslie M. Johnson, RMR, CRR, CPE

Official Court Reporter, Branch 2

APPEARANCES

KNUTESON, HINKSTON & QUINN, by Mark Hinkston,

appearing for the Plaintiff.

MEISSNER, TIERNEY & NICHOLS, by

Michael Cohen and Dieter Juedes, appearing

for the Defendant.

Asst. City Attorney, Nicole Larsen, present.

Plaintiff present in person.

THE COURT: Good morning. This is the case of

Sandy Weidner versus the City of Racine, case number

17-CV-1644.

The action is brought here on a motion for

contempt. There have been several motions that have been

filed today.

I'm not sure if counsel are privy to them or

not, but I received -- Actually, my clerk received from

Mr. Wait -- Mr. Wait, would you identify yourself, raising

your hand -- a pro-se motion to intervene under 803.09

(1). I will have that file stamped now, sir.

There also was a motion to intervene by Mr.

Spahn on behalf of Freedom of Information Council. Mr.

Spahn, you're here, correct?

MR. SPAHN: Correct, your Honor. Just to be

clear, the letter that was submitted was on behalf of the

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and five different entities.

THE COURT: Thank you for that, so a request to

intervene. I am not sure if I understand the import of

both of the interventions.

I don't suppose, and this question goes to Mr.

Spahn as well as Mr. Wait. Mr. Spahn, I know, is a

lawyer. Mr. Wait, I don't believe that you are. Is that

correct?

MR. WAIT: That's correct.

THE COURT: Open participation in a contempt

hearing. Is that accurate?

MR. WAIT: I am sorry, your Honor?

THE COURT: Open participation or opening of the

courtroom with respect to allegations of contempt.

MR. WAIT: That's correct, your Honor. We just

wanted today's hearing to be held in open court, your

Honor.

THE COURT: Mr. Wait?

MR. WAIT: I wasn't aware that this was a

contempt hearing, being that there is no information

available on CCAP.

THE COURT: My question is very specific, sir.

Is your motion to intervene that today's hearing with

respect to contempt be open to the public, yes or no?

MR. WAIT: I would request that if I can

verbally to be done, yes.

THE COURT: We don't make verbal requests, sir.

You have every right to appear pro se under Wisconsin law

and by our constitution, but you do not get any pass with

respect to procedure or process. Do you understand that?

MR. WAIT: Yes.

THE COURT: The Court never had an intent to

close the hearing on contempt today. I don't know where

that came from. I've seen it eluded to in a number of

articles that have been provided by Mr. Cohen.

I've seen it eluded to in the Racine Journal

Times as of this very date. The content of the nature of

the contempt issue, the disclosure of the information,

which is subject to court seal, does not have to be

addressed or brought up in terms of the contempt issue.

The issue here is quite narrow and specific.

Did Ms. Weidner violate a seal order by this Court by

disclosing information to third parties, not parties privy

to this, Mr. Hinkston, Mr. Cohen, or the parties that were

allowed access to this document.

That matter is before the Court of Appeals. The

issue of my sealing is one of the issues that's present

before the Court of Appeals.

However, one does not get to simply violate a

seal order because you may think it's illegal, or

improper, or an erroneous exercise of discretion by this

Court.

So the issue, the narrow focus of my hearing, is

public access to the issue of whether or not Ms. Weidner

was held in contempt or should be held in contempt for

violation of a court's order but, secondly, the content of

the information, which is under seal, will not be

disclosed or should not be mentioned during the course of

this proceeding.

That seal order remains in effect by my order,

also by the order of the Court of Appeals.

So that information should not be disclosed.

Secondarily, so I don't know if that takes care of your

concern, Mr. Spahn, or not, but your client --

This courtroom will be open to the public for

the contempt proceeding, and you can address that later

on, Mr. Wait, as well.

Secondly, there's been a request from

Mr. Hinkston for an adjournment of this matter indicating

that he believes that, based on the nature of the

allegations in the contempt filings in this matter, that

you have a conflict of interest. Is that accurate?

MR. HINKSTON: Yes, your Honor.

THE COURT: The Court need not go through those.

Those, of course, would be your duty and responsibility if

there was a conflict not to represent Ms. Weidner, so the

question then flows to Ms. Weidner directly.

Do you seek counsel at this proceeding, ma'am?

MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I have, your Honor.

THE COURT: Do you seek to have counsel sitting

next to you at this proceeding?

MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I do, your Honor.

THE COURT: Very well. The Court is deferential

to that. The Court will allow you time to retain counsel

to be here for this matter.

I know that Mr. Cohen objects to that and has

cited that there has been additional dissemination of

information, which is at least theoretically subject to

the seal order in this matter made by Ms. Weidner.

She eludes into the Racine Journal Times as late

as today, this morning I saw. I can't verify the accuracy

of the reporting, that it was at the urging of someone

else that you disclose information.

This Court's position, ma'am, is that whether or

not you agree or disagree with my seal order, it is an

order of this Court. You must be compliant with that

order.

Even if you think it is imprudent or an abuse of

exercise of discretion, you must be compliant with that

order until the Court of Appeals, which your present

counsel has brought before it as an issue, renders its

determination. Do you understand, ma'am?

MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I do, your Honor.

THE COURT: Mr. Cohen, anything you wish to add?

MR. COHEN: No, your Honor.

THE COURT: Mr. Hinkston?

MR. HINKSTON: No, your Honor.

THE COURT: Then back to you, Ms. Weidner. Have

you taken some effort to try and obtain counsel?

MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I have, your Honor.

THE COURT: Can you tell me without -- I don't

want to know any names, but have you retained someone?

MS. WEIDNER: Yes, we are meeting tomorrow at

4:00.

THE COURT: So I do not want to adjourn this

matter for a great deal of time.

I am going to give you the next set court date,

and I would ask that whoever that counsel is, that you

make sure that that counsel will be available for that

hearing. Do you understand?

MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I do, your Honor.

THE CLERK: October 3 in the afternoon.

THE COURT: Could you check your calendars for

October 3 in the afternoon, please?

MR. COHEN: Your Honor, I have matter, but I

will move that matter. I think this is a matter of some

importance.

THE COURT: Mr. Cohen, thank you for that

courtesy. Mr. Hinkston, I am not sure what your

participation will be, if at all, but can you check your

calendar?

MR. HINKSTON: Yes. I have no conflict, your

Honor.

THE COURT: So that will be the date,

Ms. Weidner. Would you check with your new counsel to

make sure that if you do retain this person, that he will

be available that date and time prepared to go, all right?

MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I will, your Honor.

MR. COHEN: I heard afternoon.

THE CLERK: 1:30.

THE COURT: I'd like to impose on someone here

to prepare an order that the contempt hearing will be open

to the public.

However, the content of the information that's

subject to the seal order will not be disclosed or

divulged by anyone.

Essentially, the Court is not going to

re-litigate its decision relative to the sealing. Yes,

Mr. Spahn?

MR. SPAHN: Your Honor, I appreciate your

willingness to let me be heard.

Given that this proceeding is open, I was

wondering if your Honor would unseal the motion for

contempt?

THE COURT: I cannot, because it includes

matters that are partial to the seal.

I want to make myself quite clear. I am willing

to open this courtroom for the issue of contempt, but with

respect to the actual content of the seal order, that's

not going to be part and parcel.

The issue here is very simplistic to the Court's

eye, and the hearing will be focused in that aspect. Mr.

Cohen, can I lean on you to prepare that order?

MR. COHEN: Be happy to.

THE COURT: Anything else then?

MR. HINKSTON: No, your Honor.

THE COURT: All right, thank you.

MR. COHEN: Thank you, your Honor.

(Hearing adjourned).

STATE OF WISCONSIN)

) SS:

COUNTY OF RACINE )

I, Leslie M. Johnson, RMR, CRR, CPE, Official Court Reporter,

Branch 2, do hereby certify that the foregoing transcript

constituting of 10 pages inclusive is a true and accurate

transcript of the proceedings taken on the 25th day of

September, 2018.

Dated this 25th day of September, 2018.

Leslie M. Johnson (electronically signed)

__________________________________________

Leslie M. Johnson, RMR, CRR, CPE

Official Court Reporter, Branch 2

Now let's take a look at the court's daily calendar posting by the court door on the day of the hearing.

Note the date and printed time of 7:31 am concerning the 
scheduled hearing at 9am.

Now go back and read the transcripts again.

"THE COURT: The Court never had an intent to

close the hearing on contempt today. I don't know where

that came from."

Does the above posting at the court door indicate any intent by the circus court to hold an open court hearing as of 7:31am on the day of hearing? The answer is no.

Was there any public notice posted of the contempt hearing?
Again the answer is NO!

No publicly posted notice of the 9-25-2017 contempt hearing exist  on the WCCA format, nor on any other posted media known to this writer despite the advanced court scheduling of the contempt hearing.
The errors, acts and omissions of this court's egregious conduct of the 9-25-2018 hearing begs a forensic audit of the complete  court case history.

A perfect storm of evidence alluding to conspiracy, complicity and collusion of a judge attempting to silence an open records plaintiff. 

On Sept. 24th. the law office of Godfrey Kahn s.c. faxed a letter notifying the court that the collective News Media wishes to intervene in the matter under Wisconsin statues 803.09. 

 The morning of the hearing, at approximately 8:15 am,  a pro se litigant filed a motion to intervene with authorities, or in the Alternative motion to adjourn into the circus court system.  These two filings by independent movants help provide the plaintiff the relief she needed to secure an open contempt of court hearing and a short reprieve from a very malicious, punitive and complicit judge.

RCC maintains the judge has overstepped his authority by sealing an open records case.


Attention Judge Gag-the-bitch
You may silence Sandy, but you won't silence us.

A "gofundme" account has been established to help with 
Sandy Weidner's legal fight.
Please help her fight the good fight against the evil empire.
https://www.gofundme.com/help-alderman-fight-secret-court

We at RCC say

GAME ON! 

Gasiorkiewicz - Letteney - Cohen
conspiring clowns