ILLUMINATING HIDDEN TRUTHS

STATE VS. KYLE RITTENHOUSE

Kenosha County Circuit Court case # 2020CF000983

Kenosha Judge gives resounding vote of NO CONFIDENCE to D.A.'s office.

In a highly unusual ruling,

Kenosha Judge Bruce Schroeder

denied the Kenosha County District Attorney's

Office access to Kyle Rittenhouse's

home address and further sealed

the address from the public

        

It appears the judge may be aware of 

Kenosha County District Attorney

Michael Gravely personally involving

 himself with local loony tune activist 

Whitney Cabal.

You may read more about it here:

http://kenoshacountyeye.com/2021/01/28/another-day-another-32-pages-of-text-messages-between-kenosha-da-mike-graveley-and-blm-extremist-whitney-cabal/

This vote of no confidence reflects poorly upon Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Gravely and Attorney's Binger and Zapf who are collectively prosecuting the case. 

THE GOOD

Judge Bruce Schroeder

Rules on law, not emotion

THE BAD

Judge Chad Kerkman

Kerkmans Korrupt Kourt

Promotes and engages in illegal secret courts

THE UGLY

                      Michael Gravely

Kenosha County District Attorney

NOT PHOTOSHOPPED!

Places party before country

Abuses his powers of prosecutorial discretion 

Engages in selective and malicious prosecution

Giving White Power gesture?

Support people who are working for Honest, Open and Transparent Government

ILLUMINATING HIDDEN TRUTHS 

Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine

Court hearing on 2-10-2021 cancelled

K K K

Kerkman's Korrupt Kourt 

In an outrageous ruling,

Judge Chad Kerkman has ruled conflicting and/or altered documents submitted into his court is not only acceptable, it is preferred.

In true 2nd. Judicial District form, corrupt Judge Chad Kerkman upheld the ludicrous ruling of judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz "Attorney Eyes Only" and up played his predecessor Gasiorkiewicz by ruling that tainted records submitted into his court       wins the case. 

         Kerkman's ruling reinforced the saying                     "if you are not cheating, you are not trying". 

Folks, this is a continuation of abuse of judicial power to hide the truth and thwart justice.

City of Racine Attorney Scott Letteney and Michael Cohen of the law firm of 

Meissner, Tierney, Fisher & Nichols S.C.  

has abused their powers as officers of the court by filing and misrepresenting documents as being true and accurate records before the court. Fact are the documents were misrepresentations of actual files of a power point presentation presented to City of Racine officials. 

BE OUTRAGED

BE VERY OUTRAGED ! 

Ultimately, this falls upon Mayor Cory Mason's  continued secret agenda's which include using corrupt courts against the citizens of Racine.

ILLUMINATING HIDDEN TRUTHS 

BE OUTRAGED

BE VERY OUTRAGED

Racine County Circuit Court case # 17CV1644 

Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine

The failure of the court's decision to only allow the City's Power Point Presentation "For Attorney's Eyes Only" has become grossly evident.

This is a court case that initially turned south when Judge Gasiorkiewicz denied Plaintiff's rights to amend her complaint within 6 months.

 Eugene Gasiorkiewicz then created the illegal secret court and ordered court documents concerning a Power Point Presentation "For Attorney Eyes Only" claiming the entire presentation as attorney work privilege. 

Court records reveal City of Racine Attorney Scott Letenney and Michael Cohen have unscrupulously filed multiple different PowerPoint presentations for the court's review while asserting they are all original files presented to the city's Executive Committee meeting......

It appears that Attorney Cohen and Scott Letteney has committed Fraud Upon the Court by filing numerous PowerPoint presentations that are not accurate filings of the actual PowerPoint presentation to the Executive Committee. 

Heavily redacted emails between Cohen and Sandy's attorney Mark Hinkston confirms different versions of the Power Point Presentation were submitted into court records by the City of Racine.

Attorney Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen attempts to minimize his failures by stating: "The differences in the two versions of the PowerPoints are very minor and do not affect the summary judgment decision".

We at RCC disagree with Mr. Cohen because veracity does matter within a legitimate court.

Which begs the questions:

Which affidavits of Michael Cohen's are true? 

Within this case no affidavits can now be trusted from 

City of Racine Attorneys ! 

Further the court had concealed from public view an 18 page Plaintiff's Brief filed on January 12th.  The court file was hidden from the public on WCCA records and only made known today after RCC had made inquires into the existence of the document.

WTF?

The first $100 dollar question is:

Why would this court continue to conceal court documents from the public?

The second $100 dollar question is:

Why would attorney Cohen file an affidavit indicating his filings lack veracity?

The insanity of this case continues.

The Secrecy of

Kerkman's Korrupt Kourt Kontinues !

Next hearing open to the public

 February 10th at 11AM

Kenosha County Courthouse

Want to read the emails?

Send us an email request and we will promptly forward the documents for free.

racinecountycorruption@gmail.com

Disclaimer:

Limited time offer

Some restrictions apply

Not valid where taxed

Not for the faint of heart

Crooked attorneys and other rift raft need not apply

  

      

ILLUMINATING HIDDEN TRUTHS

 

Edward A. Vanderventer v. Hyundai Motor America

Appeal Number 2020AP001052

The continuing saga of the missing court transcripts

COURT REPORTER Downtown Brande Browne is Located !

IN A RECENT court hearing, Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz stated AWOL Court reporter Brande Browne was located and is currently hospitalized in Madison.

According to judge Gasiorkiewicz, The court reporter's mother had contacted state officials within the court system and informed them of her daughters whereabouts.

The judge further went on to say Brande Browne's mother stated she knew the whereabouts of Brande's stenograph machine and two laptop computers used in conjunction with court reporting. State officials are working to secure the equipment according to Gasiorkiewicz whom informed appalled litigants.

60 days of being AWOL begs CHAIN OF CUSTODY concerns. 

Should the court reporters equipment be secured by state officials, the integrity of the files can no way be ascertained do to the lack of chain of custody of the equipment.

The state will have to acquire the pass codes directly from the court reporter to open the files or will they will have to enter the computer files thru a back door.

Either way this court case is simultaneously a lawyers dream and nightmare at the same time while a judge's worst nightmare.

During the ZOOM video conference, discussions between the litigants and the court surmised they may be able to somewhat recreate the court record being both parties received some info from the court reporter on a hearing basis.

Court files are the property of the State of Wisconsin. 

Brande Browne is a State of Wisconsin employee. This raises the very interesting questions of who is responsible for the cost of retrieving the documents which were already paid for.

During the hearing judge Gasiorkiewicz stated to the litigants they may have to share the cost associated with the retrieval of the court files.

SAY WHAT !!!

Let's see how this legally works out.

The State owns the records of the Court. 

Court reporter Brande Browne is an employee of the State.

Brande Browne uses State supplied equipment to record court hearings and trial.

The court reporter goes AWOL.

How is it the litigants responsibility to pay again for what they have already paid for ?

This problem was caused by an AWOL state official using state issued equipment under the supervision of a State employed judge conducting State court proceedings!

The litigants have no control or say concerning court records.

Just doesn't make any sense.

We think the judge is off his rocker!

And here is the next kicker.

According to judge Gasiorkiewicz there is two, maybe three other of his court cases missing transcripts.

Can't make this shit up folks.

There is a lot more to this story to be told in the near future, but for now pray for all who are in need.

ILLUMINATING HIDDEN TRUTHS

38 million dollar Racine Court verdict against 

Hyundai in Jeopardy ! 

Edward A. Vanderventer v. Hyundai Motor America

Appeal Number 2020AP001052

 

Which titles do you prefer?

What happened to 

Downtown Brande Browne ?

or

Disorder in the court?

or

Where have all the transcripts gone?

 Court proceedings within judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz court has been placed in a state of disarray due to an AWOL court reporter.

  Court reporter Brande Browne vanished, abandoned her premises and flew the coup, leaving the requester of court transcripts empty handed and a pocket full of money spent by a litigant absconded by Brande Browne.

Many possible scenarios exist concerning her disappearance.

Did she just skip town with a pocket full of change?

Was she paid off to disappear?

Was she kidnapped?

Was she killed to prevent publishing the transcripts?

Did her stenotype machine fail?

Did she actually input shorthand into the Stenotype machine?

 Is she incapacitated by drugs?

Or did she just get tired judge Gasiorkiewicz?

You may read some of the court files here:

UPDATED FILES BELOW:

https://wscca.wicourts.gov/appealHistory.xsl?caseNo=2020AP001052&cacheId=CBE8457D57A5CB87A4B123CA299F0AB8&linkOnlyToForm=false&sortDirection=DESC

http://kenoshacountyeye.com/2021/01/11/racine-court-reporter-in-hot-water-over-transcripts-warrant-issued/

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/wisconsin/2021/01/13/missing-court-reporter-delays-appeal-38-million-case/4146168001/

http://www.westsjuryverdicts.com/WisBar/caseofthemonth202005.htm

According to WCCA records, Brande has had her share of legal trouble lately including an OWI offense, but stiffing a litigant out of transcripts after paying for them and going AWOL is over the top.

A warrant for her arrest has been issued and Downtown Brande Browne has gone from a court reporter to now a fugitive from justice.

Folks, the 2nd Judicial District continues to remain in disarray because of both process and people.

Numerous illegal secret hearings continue to occur in the 2nd Judicial District court system do to a lack of leadership, consistency and uniformity within the district. Chief judge Jason Rossell has been lax and irresponsible concerning these continuing secret courts under his jurisdiction.  

Brande Browne going AWOL should lead all litigants to question whether the work product delivered by Browne was accurate.

What do court reporters do?

 Court reporters are known as guardians of the record. Their role of impartiality within the judicial process capture the words spoken by everyone during a court or deposition proceeding. Court reporters then prepare verbatim transcripts of court and deposition proceedings.

Let's hope Brande took her mission as gaurdians of the record to the extreme and will soon reappear to distribute the transcripts.

Have you read this in the Racine Journal Times?

Have you read anything relevant recently in the 

Journal Times ?

Folks, we can't make this shit up!

State of Wisconsin vs. Christian Reynoso

UPDATE

to the 

Dickert Disaster 

As court proceedings move forward, Former mayor John Dickert and Christian Reynoso begin preparing for trial.

As you may recall, Dickert and Reynoso were involved in an altercation at the Piggly Wiggly parking lot on Washington Ave. Initially only Dickert was charged on 5-11-2020 with criminal disorderly conduct.

Dickert quickly hired Attorney Patrick Cafferty.

 Christian Reynoso was charged the following day and elected to represent himself as Pro se for the last several months.

You may read more about the incident below:

https://www.cbs58.com/news/former-racine-mayor-charged-with-disorderly-conduct-for-role-in-fight

and

https://www.lakegenevanews.net/news/local/crime-and-courts/former-racine-mayor-john-dickert-reportedly-involved-in-road-rage/article_b139a420-bac5-5acc-9f92-b40d10254006.html

As of today, December 30, 2020 Reynoso has secured the highly touted law office of Vince Bobot to represent and advocate the dismissal of charges of disorderly conduct against him.

Attorney Bobot is the right fit for Reynoso being Bobot is not an insider within the 2nd. Judicial District.

Attorney Bobot will bring forth an aggressive multi path approach to free Christian Reynoso from the wrongful disorderly conduct charges issued by the State of Wisconsin.

RCC conducted our own investigation concerning this altercation in the spring. It is our view that mayor John Dickert initiated physical contact between the two parties and is the party that violated Disorderly Conduct statute 947.01(1).

  Reynoso acted in self defense under the protections of Wisconsin statutes 939.48(1)(1).

It is further our opinion that Reynoso has civil claims against Dickert.

Reynoso is currently in school learning the profession of cheese making and Wisconsin is in need of great cheese-makers.

We foresee a future of Reynoso branded cheeses.

# FREE REYNOSO

 

Be Outraged

BE VERY OUTRAGED !

ILLUMINATING HIDDEN TRUTHS 

Will Judge Kerkman take the bait?

When it comes to fools,

there is no fool like a 

2nd. judicial district fool!!! 

The case of Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine took another nefarious turn when the City of Racine noticed up the court that they wish to pull some of their submitted documents from the court record and replace them with newly manufactured documents.  It appears Sandy's attorney caught city of Racine Attorney Scott Letteney and Michael Cohen submitting some not so Kosher documents into the court record. 

Not so kosher means possible probable

  fraudulent documents were submitted in an attempt to hide real documents and 

mislead the court.

Take a look at all the entries in one day due to false pleadings by City of Racine Attorney  Scott Letteney and Attorney Michael Cohen 

11-13-2020	Prop. order for judgment
	Additional text: Proposed - Supplemental Order and Judgment Declaring Certain Rights and Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020	Proposed Order
	Additional text: Proposed - Order Sealing and Designating as Attorneys' Eyes Only Portions of Certain Documents
11-13-2020	Exhibit
	Additional text: (Redacted) Exhbit B to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020	Exhibit
	Additional text: (Under Seal) Exhibit B to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020	Exhibit
	Additional text: (Redacted) Exhibit A to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020	Exhibit
	Additional text: (Under Seal) Exhibit A to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020	Affidavit in support of motion
	Additional text: Affidavit of Michael J Cohen in Support of the City of Racine's Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020	Exhibit
	Additional text: (Under Seal) Exhibit A to Scott Letteney Affidavit
11-13-2020	Affidavit in support of motion
	Additional text: (Redacted) Second Supplemental Affidavit of Scott R Letteney Correcting Certain Statements Contained in 08-03-20 Supplemental Affidavit and in Support of the City of Racine's Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020	Affidavit in support of motion
	Additional text: (Under Seal) Second Supplemental Affidavit of Scott R Letteney Correcting Certain Statements Contained in 08-03-20 Supplemental Affidavit and in Support of the City of Racine's Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020	Notice of motion, motion
	Additional text: Respondent City of Racine's Notice of Motion and Motion to File Portions of Certain Documents Under Seal and to Designate Certain Portions as Attorneys' Eyes Only Information
11-13-2020	Notice of motion, motion
	Additional text: (Redacted) Respondent City of Racine's Notice of Motion and Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Declaring Certain Rights and Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020	Notice of motion, motion
	Additional text: (Under Seal) Respondent City of Racine's Notice of Motion and Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Declaring Certain Rights and Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice

It is time to shake up City Hall !!!

Watch Talking Racine on YouTube ! 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCd9xym75NCDGMaT2dEgT6Q?reload=9