EXPOSING HIDDEN TRUTHS

                Maria Lazar

Maria Lazar

Say no to Maria Lazar for Supreme Court

We shouldn’t have to choose between the lesser of the two evils.

Case # 2023AP1897-LV ,   ref. Case # 20PR15 Racine County

FACT: Maria Lazar is repugnant to the U.S. Constitution.

On November 14th, 2023 Maria Lazar knowingly, willingly & maliciously ruled in contravention of the U.S. Constitution, specifically the 14^th amendment regarding Due Process. In that ruling Maria Lazar also ruled in favor of two Racine corrupt judges, Kristen Cafferty & Faye Flancher who allowed a licensed BAR attorney to file a false affidavit with impunity.  A shyster attorney named Thomas Camilli filed a false affidavit, promoted stolen valor & couldn’t produce facts to support his false allegations in his pleadings.  Camilli’s affidavit was contested with a later filed affidavit, Cafferty & Flancher didn’t act to hold attorney Camilli accountable. Veracity is dead in Cafferty’s & Flancher’s court.  Cafferty’s & Flancher’s distain for Pro se litigants is reflected within the court record.   Racine County Courts are widely known as a dirty, corrupt pay to play systems, and now so is the Court of Appeals.

Due Process is a fundamental right to every U.S. citizen. It is one of the cornerstones of our Republic.  Maria Lazar along with justices Gundrum & Gill engaged in an unconstitutional act in direct contravention of the U.S. Constitution, violating the 14^th Amendment rights of the litigant. This isn’t a new law, it was ratified in 1868, well over 150 years ago.  The 14^th amendment guarantees all U.S. citizens equal protection of the law. The law also prohibits states from depriving any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Procedural due process is a constitutional principle that requires the government to follow fair legal procedures before it can deprive a person of life, liberty, or property. This principle is supposed to ensure fairness by requiring due process of law, which generally includes providing the individual with adequate notice of the proceedings, an opportunity to be heard, and a neutral decision-maker. 

3 items clearly come to mind when Lazar, Gundrum & Gill illegally ruled on November 14^th, 2023.

1.  There was no Notice of Proceedings

2.  There was not an opportunity to be heard. 

3.  There was not a neutral decision-maker.

There was no dissenting opinion.

Justices Lazar, Gundrum & Gill conspired & engaged in a direct tort act against the litigant.

What part of Due Process don’t these bozo’s understand?

For more information & details go to:

https://wisconsinsupremecourtcorruption.blogspot.com

https://racinecountycorruption.blogspot.com

There are several blogs that cover the details of this case history.

I name names, times and files so you can investigate these claims for yourself……… be informed !

Be a paper warrior, inflict a thousand cuts.

Tyranny warrants civil disobedience.