email at racinecountycorruption@gmail.com

Wednesday, November 14, 2018


State vs. James Barker III
Racine County Circuit Court
2015CF000627

 Judge Gerald Ptacek
AKA  CROOKED!


One of the oldest open cases in Racine County Circuit Court went to trial today and retired reserve Judge Gerald Ptacek has the case.

Judge Gerald Ptacek retired in january 2017 with nearly 30 years of service on the bench.  During many of those years Judge Ptacek was running a corrupt court, conspiring with District Attorney Michael Nieskes to deny rights to citizens, abuse the court calendar to trick defendants into missing court dates, and holding ex parte meetings without defendant's knowledge or participation.

It is all part of the documented court record in case 2011FO00057 and other cases that crooked judge Gerald Ptacek oversaw. 

To no surprise to us at RCC,  judge Gerald Ptacek was selected to conduct hearings and trial for this very irregular case.  Ptacek has an extensive history of  being the perfect judge for bad cops. 

 Irregularities in this case include allegations of destruction of  numerous evidence files by law enforcement, serving of an unsigned search warrant,  planting of evidence and  law enforcement destroying security recordings on the defendants security camera system.

We are not saying or implying that Mr. Barker is or is not guilty of receiving or selling of stolen goods. We don't have the facts and that is what trial should expose.
You may learn more here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgoTeZgMIcU

But we do know this for fact, judge Ptacek and his court goons are back to their old bag of tricks by posting false information onto WCCA records.

History with judge Ptacek has taught us be ever vigilant of his smoke and mirrors show.

Today WCCA records indicated the following

But court was not being held as posted on WCCA records.

This is part of the same pattern and practice of manipulation of the court calendar judge Ptacek has abused and subjected defendants to in his courts for years.

Not one prosecution affiliate, law enforcement officer or witness for the prosecution was downstairs in the posted court area waiting for the court doors to open.  At 8:20 am we at RCC suspected the Judge was back to his old bag of tricks.  HE WAS! 
Court trial was being conducted across the street on the 4th. floor of the courthouse

This forced the defendant to repack all his boxes and video equipment and haul it back up the stairs and across the street.

So typical of this piece of a shit judge




SCREW YOU JUDGE PTACEK !
    

Thursday, November 8, 2018

DEMOCRACY DIES IN THE DARKNESS 
OF SECRET COURTS.

When it comes to bull****
Few are as full of **** as Judge Gagthebitch
Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz 
AKA
Judge Gagthebitch

Featuring
Judge Gasiorkiewicz's 
SECRET COURT
Racine County Circuit Court
Sandy J. Weidner vs. City of Racine
Case # 17CV1644


Racine County Circuit Court Judge Eugene Gagthebitch has been working extra hours to keep inquiring minds like us from overseeing what is going on in his court.

Gagthebitch sealed the WCCA files preventing citizens to review online court records, sealed the hearing dates, sealed the hearings, sealed the review of court information at the clerk's office, sealed the City's legal expenses and ordered everyone involved in the Sandy Weidner vs.City of Racine to keep quiet. 

SO WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? 
Everything in this secret court is sealed! 
Nothing to see here! Move along!


This is what happens when a judge thinks 
his middle name is GOD!

Early in this case, the judge had decided make make a public policy decision to completely seal the court proceedings. The complete court record was sealed including the docketing # and party names.
For months, all was going quite well and as planned in Judge Gasiorkiewicz court. Michael Cohen was representing the city of Racine racking up big billing hours.  Sandy Weidner legal efforts were brickwalled and ruled against time after time. 
How could anybody possibly now interfere with judge Gasiorkiewicz's pet secret court case?
The general public was clueless that the 
open records case even existed. These insane secret court proceedings went on for months in the darkness of Eugene Gasiorkiewicz's secret court without public scrutiny and oversight.  


 Then Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel reporter Bruce Vielmetti broke the case to the public. 

Soon afterwards contempt of court proceedings were brought against Sandy Weidner. A secret 9 A.M.contempt hearing on the 25th. of September was scheduled. This secret hearing was to quash any remaining fight out of her. 

Gagthebitch's deathstar contempt of court proceedings traps were well oiled, the attorneys palms were further greased, the kill was imminent and the vultures were waiting. 

Image result for vulture circling gif

Until.......  

until a pro se litigant and the collective news media independently  took action upon the court to intervene.

One could say a monkey wrench was thrown into court.

Now the case is in the public's eye.


 This is where reality hits judge Gasiorkiewicz
The dirty dealings of the Racine County Circuit Court system is once again exposed and its trail leads all the way to the complicit Appeals Court where judge Lisa Neubauer prominently sits.

Any legitimate Appeals court would have reviewed the case and immediately remanded this case back to the circuit court.

Instead Sandy Weidner is now fighting in the darkness of two complicit courts. 

The written record vs. the oral record 

Below are printed court documents of 
Racine County Circuit Court case # 17CV1644 
as of 9-24-2018 and the morning of the 
contempt hearing on 9-25-2018 

WCCA online record search using Case #


WCCA online record search using judge's schedule

Publicly posted at the courtroom door

The court could not have made it any more clear that the case is sealed and not open to the public.
 As of 7:31 am the court had publicly posted 
at the court room door the case is sealed.

These written court facts are both indisputable and irrefutable.

At 8:30 am the pro se litigant files his motion to intervene.

Shortly before 9am, the court staff cordially invited all the interested parties waiting at the door into the courtroom.  When the Judge entered the courtroom, he was noticeably upset.

Here is what judge Gasiorkiewicz stated orally in court on the morning of September 25th. 2018.


THE COURT: The Court never had an intent to
close the hearing on contempt today. I don't know where
that came from. I've seen it eluded to in a number of
articles that have been provided by Mr. Cohen.
I've seen it eluded to in the Racine Journal

Times as of this very date.
Say what?
We think the judge is choking gagging on his own words

How do you tell when a judge is lying?
When they move their lips !

Just like the Making of a Murderer subject Brendan Dassey 
Judge Gasiorkiewicz in his own words has subjected himself to prima facie evidence that he conspired and engaged in ethics violations by conspiring and failing to give public notice of court proceedings and hearings. 


Didn't judge Gasiorkiewicz just find Sandy Weidner guilty of contempt of court using prima facie evidence?

Karma is a bitch!
Thank you judge Gagthebitch

An ethics complaint is in the works!

Judges are never as powerful as they tell you they are. 
Citizens are never as meek as they think you are.

Resign now Gagthebitch! 

Sunday, November 4, 2018

DERELICT & SECRET 
COURTS  
Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz
aka
Judge Gagthebitch

In Racine county, we have seen the rise of derelict, secret courts denying and attacking fellow citizens rights.

In theory, courts in Wisconsin exist to rule by law, to administer justice, to enhance social order, resolve disputes, to ensure due process, guarantee liberty and maintain the balance of equality between government and the citizen. 

But in Racine county, many of its judges are derelict to both their duties and their sworn oath of office, engaging in egregious conduct against public rights.

Case in point;
Sandra J. Weidner vs. City of Racine
Racine County Circuit Court case  # 17CV1644
Ms. Weidner had filed an open records request into the City of Racine seeking public records citing Wisconsin statutes 19.31-39 for empowerment.
The City of Racine refused to release all records, citing some of the records as being privileged and/or protected. Ms. Weidner than filed a civil suit against the city seeking the court to order the production of the withheld documents.

 The court conducted a hearing and during that hearing acted to seal the entire court record, including the court docketing # and the names of the involved parties over the objections of the plaintiff and her legal counsel. 

This is where judge Gasiorkiewicz royally screwed up. Citizens have both the right and authority to oversee our courts.  Judges sworn into office have an obligation to protect those citizen rights while conducting court. Judge Gasiorkiewicz engaged in judicial misconduct by overstepping his authority to seal the entire court record, denying citizens their right to oversee court proceedings, and worse yet the judge creating public policy.

Citizens are empowered by the U.S. Constitution, the State of Wisconsin Constitution and all the associated laws of both the State and Federal governments to oversee the courts.
Under Wisconsin statute 59.20(3), citizens are directly empowered to the opening of the Circuit Court record to public examination;
The court shall:
" open to the examination of any person all books
and papers required to be kept in his or her office and permit
any person so examining to take notes and copies of such
books, records, papers or minutes ...."
Judge Gagthebitch unethically and illegally sealed a civil court record. Gagthebitch ordered both the docketing # of the circuit court case and the names of the litigating parties involved sealed. This sealing of the public record is a direct attack against public interest and against public rights. The First Amendment of the
U. S. constitution guarantees that American court proceedings are presumptively open to the public. The U.S. Supreme court has explained the public's presumptive right of access to court proceedings are rooted in both logic and history

RIGHTS NEGLECTED ARE RIGHTS LOST
If one neglects their rights, than one can argue they have effectively lost their rights. Only thru perseverance and tenacity of individuals in our society has our rights been safeguarded from the derelict and lawless courts the likes of judge Gasiorkiewicz. The sealing of the public record is an attack on our 1st. Amendment of the U.S. constitution. By the act of sealing the entire public record, judge Gagthebitch has thrown a monkey wrench into our ability to gain insight into a now dark court, thereby restricting or denying our ability to fully engage in public discourse of the acts, facts and workings of the court.
The Court of Appeals has also completely sealed the Appeals record of Sandra Weidner.
No information, docketing #'s or case information is available.
We are providing the following for our readers.
Sandra J. Weidner v. City of Racine
The Court of Appeals case # 18AP1189
There - now it is no longer a secret Court of Appeals docketing # !


Gagthebitch !!!

Coming soon is a review of the derelict and complicit District 2 Court of Appeals. See how retired/reserve Racine County Circuit Court judge Gerald Ptacek and Court of Appeals Judge Lisa Neubauer along with her hatchet men have been using the lower court rulings to deny citizens their rights. See who supports judge Lisa Neubauer for the upcoming April Supreme Court election.

https://judgeneubauer.com/our-supporters/


Yes - both Gagthebitch and Ptacek are on Judge Lisa Neubauer's list and neither judge is honorable, our guess 80% on the list are not honorable as well.

Resign now Gagthebitch!

Sunday, October 7, 2018


Just Say NO
TO THE TWO POISON POLITICAL PARTIES
Washington D.C.  

End the disease of hyper partisanship
Cut the puppet strings 
of the two political parties! 

Think independently
 Vote independently 


PLACE
 COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY

Vote


Friday, October 5, 2018

Illuminating Hidden Truths
Party sealed vs. Party sealed
Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine 
Racine County Circuit Court
case # 2017CV001644

The question that begs asking;
What is in Sandy Weidner's open records request along with the City of Racine responses that is so damning that Judge Gasiorkiewicz has violated his oath of office and has both conspired and acted to deny citizens rights to keep this case sealed?
???
???
Conspiracy
Complicity
Collusion
   Illuminating hidden truths 


Conspiracy
Complicity
Collusion

That's our take of this very serious breach of public trust

Wednesday, October 3, 2018



Racine Circus Court case # 2017CV001644
Weidner Found Guilty of Contempt of Court
and
RCC finds the court in contempt of the public

Judge Gagthebitch during his final comments of today's court hearing called Weidner's case "the most egregious" example of contempt of court he's seen by a lawmaker. 
Gagthebitch further stated during the hearing;
"It is pure anarchy if people do not obey a court order," "That is the heart-blood of an orderly society."


In an honest court, all that the judge stated above would be accurate .


But Judge Gasiorkiewicz's court is not an honorable court.

If one blindly obeys an order of a corrupt and secret court
 then we may have tyranny

Think about this folks, it is the  
 irony and hypocrisy of an open records request morphing into a sealed court case that is strikingly counterintuitive to the very heart and soul of Wisconsin Public Record laws.


The preponderance of evidence of the Sept.25th sealed court hearing exposes the judge as a manipulative double talking scoundrel that begs for a forensic audit of this court case. 

Court transcripts along with supporting documents of the Sept.25th hearing posted in our Sept. 27th blog illuminates Judge Gagthebitch actively conspiring to deny Ms. Weidner the right of the public to attend the 
scheduled UNPOSTED hearing. 

The court's egregious conduct has knowingly put Ms. Weidner in a Catch 22 situation.  A situation of irrational circular reasoning to which there is no way out of the judges trap.  

The Catch 22
By violating the gag order, Ms Weidner allows the public to scrutinize the court, but doing so puts her in harm's way of contempt of court.  If she complies with the gag order she remains in a secret court subject 
to the wrath of tyranny.
Asserting her First amendment rights will benefit an informed public but in doing so risk additional fines and damage claims the court may assess.

There exist no rational reasoning to escape the circular conundrum.

This is an open records case.
 Only a complete fool or complicit judge would put a litigant into this position.  

. The judge has not only violated Ms. Weidner, the judge has conspired to violate every Wisconsin citizens rights to access public records and to court proceedings. 

Tyranny begins in secret courts, quashing one opponent at a time without the knowledge and scrutiny of the general public.
Secret courts are a cornerstone of tyranny.

Any sealed court case should be highly questioned and challenged by the general public. To leave your fellow citizen go it alone in a secret court is desertion of morals and ideals, thus creating ideal circumstances for evil to flourish.
Image result for first they came meme

This court plays very dirty.
Judge Gasiorkiewicz was put on notice before the Oct 3rd. hearing that he was derelict of his judicial responsibilities by failing to post public notice of the hearing. We at RCC assert the court knowingly failed to post notice of today's hearing and the Sept. 25th hearing.  Judge Gasiorkiewicz conspired and knowingly subverted Wisconsin laws to act against the rights of citizens. These judicial errors, acts and omissions are contrary to Wisconsin statutes and the Wisconsin constitution, in doing so the judge has violated his oath of office.


During the court hearing, Judge Gasiorkiewicz used prima facie evidence to hold Sandy Weidner in contempt of court. 

Holding Judge Gasiorkiewicz to the same prima facie standard, Judge Gasiorkiewicz is guilty of conspiring and acting to subvert Wisconsin statutes, the Wisconsin constitution and 
First Amendment rights. 

RCC calls for the resignation or removal of Judge Gasiorkiewicz for blatant errors, acts and omissions of his judicial duties.  


Today

We found Sandy Weidner acting as a patriot !



Monday, October 1, 2018

Racine County Circus Court Case
# 2017CV001644
Sandy Weidner Vs. City of Racine 
Sealed party Vs. Sealed party
For further background information,
go to our previous post

Upcoming "Showtime" event !

Brought to you by Judge Gagthebitch

Judge Gasiorkiewicz is continuing his popular negligence courtroom circus show by again skirting his professional duties as A Racine County Judge.

Sandy Weidner's next unposted hearing is Wednesday, Oct. 3rd, 1:30 PM., 7th. floor 
of the Racine County Circus Court. 

Despite Judge Gasiorkiewicz being put on notice for his negligence of performing his duties as a Judge,  
Gag-the-bitch (Gasiorkiewicz) has not made provisions to post a public notice of the court hearing. 

Citizens are invited and encouraged to attend the unposted and POSSIBLY sealed hearing.

Ne iudex in vobis induendum
(Don't let the judge wear you down)

What are the chances of an open records case becoming a legally COMPLETELY SEALED court record?
-ZERO-



COME ONE COME ALL TO THE 

GREATEST CIRCUS COURT OF ALL !


AKA Judge Gag-the-bitch


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, September 27, 2018



RACINE
JUDGE
GASIORKIEWICZ
GAG-THE-BITCH

EXPOSED 
Racine County Circuit Court 
case #2017CV001644
Sandy Weidner Vs. City of Racine
https://www.gofundme.com/help-alderman-fight-secret-court

A very troubling court case is currently working its way through the Racine County Circuit Court system involving our right to open records, free speech and the ability to seek redress with 
public discourse. We will get more into the case details shortly.

Judge Gasiorkiewicz was elected to office in 2010 and since has garnered many critics and detractors of his controversial decisions.
According to several attorney surveys, Judge Gasiorkiewicz was lowly rated by his legal peers.

Perhaps his most controversial case before him involved the token sentencing of a 4 month slap on the back in jail to scion billionaire Sam Curtis Johnson 3rd,  for sexual assault of a child.

Despite his controversy as judge for the last 8 years, it appeared nobody knew how to pronounce Gasiorkiewicz's name.

Problem solved with this open records court case.

This ugly legal case has revealed 
his appropriate phonic name.

Gagthebitch!

A name that will live for infamy.
This legal case is another low for the Racine County Circuit courts and is an inside attack on all Americans.  

For real journalism about this very dangerous court precedent, and to gain background information, click on the two hyperlinks provided below

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/secret-open-records-case-racine-seeks-sanctions-against-alderwoman/1410143002/

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/25/judge-delays-contempt-hearing-secret-racine-open-records-case/1421017002/





Back to the case.
 An active ongoing open records case has been sealed in the Racine County Circus Court System and has been appealed to the higher circus court where an apparent complicit Racine native, Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals Lisa Neubauer also determined to maintain a closed court to the public. We say complicit because even the names of the parties involved in this court case is sealed.

Sealing of public records is contrary to 
Wisconsin Statutes 19.31-39, 757.14 and the First Amendment of our U.S. Constitution, guaranteeing our following rights.    
1. Public assembly in a public courthouse and courtroom
2.      Right to free speech - including the right to listen to what is spoken.
3.      Right to petition government and seek redress with public discourse or argument in support of as such.

RCC asserts the circus courts are 
suppressing free and open debate 
by the arbitrary sealing of the records and as such is 
oppressing others in free speech issues.

Racine County Circus Court case # 2017CV001644
Sandy Weidner Vs. City of Racine
Sealed party Vs. Sealed party

 Racine County Circus Court 

The honorable Judge Gasiorkiewicz 
PRESIDING
AKA Judge Gag-the-bitch

We at RCC award Judge Gag-the-bitch the coveted 3 "C" plus "C" prize.
complicity-conspiracy-collusion+corruption

This case brings to mind the lyrics from the Tremeloes

Silence is golden
But my eyes still see
Silence is golden golden
But my eyes still see
Talking  is cheap people follow like sheep 
Even though there is no where to go
How could she tell he deceived her so well
Pity she'll be the last one to know


Enjoy the music while you 
continue to read

We at RCC did a quick forensic analysis of the following court transcripts and found things are not as they say.

Here are a few excerpts.

During the hearing did Attorney Cohen object 
to adjourn the hearing?
NO!   Judge Gag-the-bitch spoke for the defense attorney.
"I know that Mr. Cohen objects to that and has
cited that there has been additional dissemination of
information, which is at least theoretically subject to
the seal order in this matter made by Ms. Weidner."
During oral arguments of the hearing,
Judge Gag-the-bitch states that defense attorney Cohen objects to the adjournment without Mr. Cohen making 
such a verbal court record. 
But how did the judge know?
ex parte conversations?
Hand signals?
sign language?
 googly eyes?

Googly eyes really do make everything better


Now for the court transcripts

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT RACINE COUNTY
Branch 2
---------------------------------------------------------------
SANDRA J. WEIDNER,
Plaintiff, MOTION
vs. Case No. 17-CV-1644
CITY OF RACINE,
Defendant.
---------------------------------------------------------------
HONORABLE EUGENE A. GASIORKIEWICZ
Judge Presiding
Date of Hearing:
September 25, 2018
Leslie M. Johnson, RMR, CRR, CPE
Official Court Reporter, Branch 2
APPEARANCES
KNUTESON, HINKSTON & QUINN, by Mark Hinkston,
appearing for the Plaintiff.
MEISSNER, TIERNEY & NICHOLS, by
Michael Cohen and Dieter Juedes, appearing
for the Defendant.
Asst. City Attorney, Nicole Larsen, present.
Plaintiff present in person.

THE COURT: Good morning. This is the case of
Sandy Weidner versus the City of Racine, case number
17-CV-1644.
The action is brought here on a motion for
contempt. There have been several motions that have been
filed today.
I'm not sure if counsel are privy to them or
not, but I received -- Actually, my clerk received from
Mr. Wait -- Mr. Wait, would you identify yourself, raising
your hand -- a pro-se motion to intervene under 803.09
(1). I will have that file stamped now, sir.
There also was a motion to intervene by Mr.
Spahn on behalf of Freedom of Information Council. Mr.
Spahn, you're here, correct?
MR. SPAHN: Correct, your Honor. Just to be
clear, the letter that was submitted was on behalf of the
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and five different entities.
THE COURT: Thank you for that, so a request to
intervene. I am not sure if I understand the import of
both of the interventions.
I don't suppose, and this question goes to Mr.
Spahn as well as Mr. Wait. Mr. Spahn, I know, is a
lawyer. Mr. Wait, I don't believe that you are. Is that
correct?
MR. WAIT: That's correct.
THE COURT: Open participation in a contempt
hearing. Is that accurate?
MR. WAIT: I am sorry, your Honor?
THE COURT: Open participation or opening of the
courtroom with respect to allegations of contempt.
MR. WAIT: That's correct, your Honor. We just
wanted today's hearing to be held in open court, your
Honor.
THE COURT: Mr. Wait?
MR. WAIT: I wasn't aware that this was a
contempt hearing, being that there is no information
available on CCAP.
THE COURT: My question is very specific, sir.
Is your motion to intervene that today's hearing with
respect to contempt be open to the public, yes or no?
MR. WAIT: I would request that if I can
verbally to be done, yes.
THE COURT: We don't make verbal requests, sir.
You have every right to appear pro se under Wisconsin law
and by our constitution, but you do not get any pass with
respect to procedure or process. Do you understand that?
MR. WAIT: Yes.
THE COURT: The Court never had an intent to
close the hearing on contempt today. I don't know where
that came from. I've seen it eluded to in a number of

articles that have been provided by Mr. Cohen.
I've seen it eluded to in the Racine Journal
Times as of this very date. The content of the nature of
the contempt issue, the disclosure of the information,
which is subject to court seal, does not have to be
addressed or brought up in terms of the contempt issue.
The issue here is quite narrow and specific.
Did Ms. Weidner violate a seal order by this Court by
disclosing information to third parties, not parties privy
to this, Mr. Hinkston, Mr. Cohen, or the parties that were
allowed access to this document.
That matter is before the Court of Appeals. The
issue of my sealing is one of the issues that's present
before the Court of Appeals.
However, one does not get to simply violate a
seal order because you may think it's illegal, or
improper, or an erroneous exercise of discretion by this
Court.
So the issue, the narrow focus of my hearing, is
public access to the issue of whether or not Ms. Weidner
was held in contempt or should be held in contempt for
violation of a court's order but, secondly, the content of
the information, which is under seal, will not be
disclosed or should not be mentioned during the course of
this proceeding.

That seal order remains in effect by my order,
also by the order of the Court of Appeals.
So that information should not be disclosed.
Secondarily, so I don't know if that takes care of your
concern, Mr. Spahn, or not, but your client --
This courtroom will be open to the public for
the contempt proceeding, and you can address that later
on, Mr. Wait, as well.
Secondly, there's been a request from
Mr. Hinkston for an adjournment of this matter indicating
that he believes that, based on the nature of the
allegations in the contempt filings in this matter, that
you have a conflict of interest. Is that accurate?
MR. HINKSTON: Yes, your Honor.
THE COURT: The Court need not go through those.
Those, of course, would be your duty and responsibility if
there was a conflict not to represent Ms. Weidner, so the
question then flows to Ms. Weidner directly.
Do you seek counsel at this proceeding, ma'am?
MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I have, your Honor.
THE COURT: Do you seek to have counsel sitting
next to you at this proceeding?
MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I do, your Honor.
THE COURT: Very well. The Court is deferential
to that. The Court will allow you time to retain counsel
to be here for this matter.
I know that Mr. Cohen objects to that and has
cited that there has been additional dissemination of
information, which is at least theoretically subject to
the seal order in this matter made by Ms. Weidner.
She eludes into the Racine Journal Times as late
as today, this morning I saw. I can't verify the accuracy
of the reporting, that it was at the urging of someone
else that you disclose information.
This Court's position, ma'am, is that whether or
not you agree or disagree with my seal order, it is an
order of this Court. You must be compliant with that
order.
Even if you think it is imprudent or an abuse of
exercise of discretion, you must be compliant with that
order until the Court of Appeals, which your present
counsel has brought before it as an issue, renders its
determination. Do you understand, ma'am?
MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I do, your Honor.
THE COURT: Mr. Cohen, anything you wish to add?
MR. COHEN: No, your Honor.
THE COURT: Mr. Hinkston?
MR. HINKSTON: No, your Honor.
THE COURT: Then back to you, Ms. Weidner. Have
you taken some effort to try and obtain counsel?
MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I have, your Honor.
THE COURT: Can you tell me without -- I don't
want to know any names, but have you retained someone?
MS. WEIDNER: Yes, we are meeting tomorrow at
4:00.
THE COURT: So I do not want to adjourn this
matter for a great deal of time.
I am going to give you the next set court date,
and I would ask that whoever that counsel is, that you
make sure that that counsel will be available for that
hearing. Do you understand?
MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I do, your Honor.
THE CLERK: October 3 in the afternoon.
THE COURT: Could you check your calendars for
October 3 in the afternoon, please?
MR. COHEN: Your Honor, I have matter, but I
will move that matter. I think this is a matter of some
importance.
THE COURT: Mr. Cohen, thank you for that
courtesy. Mr. Hinkston, I am not sure what your
participation will be, if at all, but can you check your
calendar?
MR. HINKSTON: Yes. I have no conflict, your
Honor.
THE COURT: So that will be the date,
Ms. Weidner. Would you check with your new counsel to
make sure that if you do retain this person, that he will
be available that date and time prepared to go, all right?
MS. WEIDNER: Yes, I will, your Honor.
MR. COHEN: I heard afternoon.
THE CLERK: 1:30.
THE COURT: I'd like to impose on someone here
to prepare an order that the contempt hearing will be open
to the public.
However, the content of the information that's
subject to the seal order will not be disclosed or
divulged by anyone.
Essentially, the Court is not going to
re-litigate its decision relative to the sealing. Yes,
Mr. Spahn?
MR. SPAHN: Your Honor, I appreciate your
willingness to let me be heard.
Given that this proceeding is open, I was
wondering if your Honor would unseal the motion for
contempt?
THE COURT: I cannot, because it includes
matters that are partial to the seal.
I want to make myself quite clear. I am willing
to open this courtroom for the issue of contempt, but with
respect to the actual content of the seal order, that's
not going to be part and parcel.
The issue here is very simplistic to the Court's
eye, and the hearing will be focused in that aspect. Mr.
Cohen, can I lean on you to prepare that order?
MR. COHEN: Be happy to.
THE COURT: Anything else then?
MR. HINKSTON: No, your Honor.
THE COURT: All right, thank you.
MR. COHEN: Thank you, your Honor.
(Hearing adjourned).

STATE OF WISCONSIN)
) SS:
COUNTY OF RACINE )
I, Leslie M. Johnson, RMR, CRR, CPE, Official Court Reporter,
Branch 2, do hereby certify that the foregoing transcript
constituting of 10 pages inclusive is a true and accurate
transcript of the proceedings taken on the 25th day of
September, 2018.
Dated this 25th day of September, 2018.
Leslie M. Johnson (electronically signed)
__________________________________________
Leslie M. Johnson, RMR, CRR, CPE

Official Court Reporter, Branch 2

Now let's take a look at the court's daily calendar posting by the court door on the day of the hearing.

Note the date and printed time of 7:31 am concerning the 
scheduled hearing at 9am.
Now go back and read the transcripts again.
"THE COURT: The Court never had an intent to
close the hearing on contempt today. I don't know where

that came from."
Does the above posting at the court door indicate any intent by the circus court to hold an open court hearing as of 7:31am on the day of hearing? The answer is no.

Was there any public notice posted of the contempt hearing?
Again the answer is NO!
No publicly posted notice of the 9-25-2017 contempt hearing exist  on the WCCA format, nor on any other posted media known to this writer despite the advanced court scheduling of the contempt hearing.
The errors, acts and omissions of this court's egregious conduct of the 9-25-2018 hearing begs a forensic audit of the complete  court case history.

A perfect storm of evidence alluding to conspiracy, complicity and collusion of a judge attempting to silence an open records plaintiff. 

On Sept. 24th. the law office of Godfrey Kahn s.c. faxed a letter notifying the court that the collective News Media wishes to intervene in the matter under Wisconsin statues 803.09. 

 The morning of the hearing, at approximately 8:15 am,  a pro se litigant filed a motion to intervene with authorities, or in the Alternative motion to adjourn into the circus court system.  These two filings by independent movants help provide the plaintiff the relief she needed to secure an open contempt of court hearing and a short reprieve from a very malicious, punitive and complicit judge.

RCC maintains the judge has overstepped his authority by sealing an open records case.


Attention Judge Gag-the-bitch
You may silence Sandy, but you won't silence us.

A "gofundme" account has been established to help with 
Sandy Weidner's legal fight.
Please help her fight the good fight against the evil empire.
https://www.gofundme.com/help-alderman-fight-secret-court

We at RCC say

GAME ON! 
Gasiorkiewicz - Letteney - Cohen
conspiring clowns