email at racinecountycorruption@gmail.com

Tuesday, September 22, 2020

  DID COURT OF APPEALS CHIEF JUDGE 

LISA NEUBAUER JUST GIVE 

CITY OF RACINE ATTORNEY 

SCOTT LETTENEY A COLD SHOULDER ?

You read  -  You decide.

                                                             Judge Lisa Neubauer

                                                                   Scott Letterney


As the city of Racine Machinery Row* fiasco continues

 to wind its way through the courts, city attorney 

Scott Letteney is becoming more desperate to thwart any courtroom advances from plaintiff's.

In recent court filings concerning Sam Azarian et al vs. City of Racine,  case #19CV1524, Scott Letteney on September 11, 2020 filed a 40 page document  into the Court of Appeals titled "DEFENDANTS PETITIONERS' PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NONFINAL ORDER AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF".  In this petition,  Letteney questioned the competency of Racine County Circuit Court Judge Jon Fredrickson.  "as to whether the circuit court lacks the competency to hear Plaintiffs-Respondents........"

The Court of Appeals promptly calendared Letteney's petition and 10 days later Letteney's petition was denied.


The second major litigant taking the City to task of fraud and illicit dealings concerning Machinery Row is Patrick Fagan.


Plaintiff Patrick Fagan has filed a motion to recuse the city's "go to" judge - Eugene Gasiorkiewicz in case #18CV1227, Patrick Fagan vs. City of Racine/Redevelopment Authority of the City of Racine.

 In Patricks' filing he has cited Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz as a judge that "cannot act in an impartial manner", citing Sandy Weidners case #17CV1644, where Gasiorkiewicz acted in a most bias and prejudice manner, wrongly denying litigant Sandy Weidner the statutory right to amend her complaint within six months of filing.


The courtship between Letteney and Neubauer appears to be strained for the time being.


Perhaps Neubauer didn't like Letteney's reference of Judge Fredrickson  as lacking competency, or maybe Neubauer doesn't want the wrath of the public to again verbally attack her character.

But keep this in mind, Neubauer still calendared Letteney in ten days, while she failed to calendar Sandy Weidner case for over 4 months until a complaint was filed against her.

And now losing the city's "go to" Judge in the Patrick Fagan vs. City of Racine case has got to hurt.

OUCH!


episode # 192

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swk8s3ByBqc&t=96s 

Friday, September 18, 2020

 Justice 4 Angel

6 years later!

For an understanding of how egregious, inept and outrageous city of Racine officials misconduct was, you need to click below:

http://justice4angel.blogspot.com/


Angel

A tentative settlement offer is in the works between   

City of Racine and Kurt Hanson due to the egregious and criminal acts conducted by City of Racine police department.

Word has it that Kurt Hanson's settlement offer for the illegal and criminal acts of killing Mr. Hanson's dog is $135,000 dollars ! 

We believe bringing this case before a jury or a judicial verdict could well exceed $500,000 dollars

 

Kurt Hanson with "dispatched" Angel


What would your $ award have been?

Saturday, September 12, 2020

 GAIGE GROSSKREUTZ

100,000 PUBLIC EMAIL CAMPAIGN

credit- source unknown
UPDATED

DEMAND ARMED BLM PROTESTER GAIGE GROSSKREUTZ BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND CHARGED WITH CRIMES RELATING TO BRANDISHING AND AIMING A WEAPON DURING THE BLM/ANTIFA RIOTS ON AUGUST 25th. 2020, violating Wisconsin Statutes 941.20 and its subsections

941.20 Endangering safety by use of dangerous weapon.
(1)  Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor:
(a) Endangers another's safety by the negligent operation or handling of a dangerous weapon.
(b) Operates or goes armed with a firearm while he or she is under the influence of an intoxicant.
(bm) Operates or goes armed with a firearm while he or she has a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood. A defendant has a defense to any action under this paragraph that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
(c) Except as provided in sub. (1m), intentionally points a firearm at or toward another.

(d) While on the lands of another discharges a firearm within 100 yards of any building devoted to human occupancy situated on and attached to the lands of another without the express permission of the owner or occupant of the building. “Building" as used in this paragraph does not include any tent, bus, truck, vehicle or similar portable unit. 

THIS IS AN EMAIL CAMPAIGN TO KENOSHA DISTRICT ATTORNEY MICHAEL GRAVELY AND A.D.A. THOMAS BINGER TO HOLD GAIGE  GROSSKREUTZ ACCOUNTABLE FOR HIS CRIMINAL ACTS OF CHASING, BRANDISHING AND AIMING A PISTOL AT KYLE RITTENHOUSE.

KENOSHA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY GRAVELY AND A.D.A. BINGER HAS A HISTORY OF FAILING TO PROVIDE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW, WRONGFUL PROSECUTION AND BAD DECISION MAKING CONCERNING LITIGATION. 

BOTH GRAVELY AND BINGER EXHIBIT ANTI SECOND AMENDMENT SENTIMENT AND HAVE ATTACKED RESPECTABLE CITIZENS FOR ASSERTING THEIR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

KYLE RITTENHOUSE HAS THE SAME PROTECTIONS AND RIGHTS TO ASSERT THE SAME STATUTES USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSERTING SELF DEFENSE WHEN PHYSICALLY ENDANGERED.

WISCONSIN STATUTE AS FOLLOWS:

939.48 Self-defense and defense of others.
(1)  A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person. The actor may intentionally use only such force or threat thereof as the actor reasonably believes is necessary to prevent or terminate the interference. The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself.

EMAIL GRAVELY AND BINGER OFTEN AND REMIND THEM OF THEIR DUTY TO PROVIDE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW TO ALL

WAS GAIGE GROSSKREUTZ UNDER THE INFLUENCE WHEN ARMED?

ASK AND FIND OUT!


GOVERNMENT ASSIGNED PUBLIC EMAIL ADDRESSES AS FOLLOWS:

copy and paste

Michael.Gravely@da.wi.gov

Thomas.Binger@da.wi.gov




D.A. Michael Gravely

Is he giving the white power sign?


 Donate for Kyle's defense against the corrupt and bias 

District Attorneys

click below:

https://www.givesendgo.com/GUCZ


Saturday, September 5, 2020

                                    "ONLY IN AMERICA" 



Victims of Feckless government agencies who failed to serve and protect Kenosha

--------------------------------------------------

Gaige Grosskreutz
Convicted criminal brandishes and points the gun  during riots, avoids criminal prosecution due to his BLM affiliation. 

 ---------------------------------------------

Jacob Blake

Commit a crime and become a millionaire

Do you think lawyer Patrick Cafferty would represent him if Blake didn't have the million dollar +  Gofundme account?

----------------------------------------

Tech companies who thrive do to our 1st. Amendment right of free speech, then censors Americans right to free speech


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



Kenosha Mayor John Antaramian

Kenosha Police chief John Mikinis


                                                                      Sheriff David Beth

Feckless NERO'S of Kenosha 

who violate their oath of office & fail to learn history

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 Michael Gravely
Kenosha County District Attorney
Is he giving the white supremacist sign? 


Thomas Binger

Special thanks goes to Kenosha County District Attorneys Michael Gravely and Thomas Binger for their unjust application of the law.


Watch the video and you decide

https://www.infowars.com/rittenhouse-the-line-in-the-sand/