What the flock?

 EXPOSING HIDDEN TRUTHS

What the Flock ? 

Why does it take citizens input for Law Enforcement to finally react ?

"Not what we agreed to"

More here:

https://share.google/n5rnMuofdI44wgyZy

RACINE SHERIFF OR FLORIDA REAL ESTATE AGENT ?

So says absentee Sheriff Schmaling to the press.

RCC says this is not suppose to be a Captains call.

But when you have an absentee Sheriff, this is what the public gets.

Who failed to perform due diligence ?

    Who failed to monitor the system ?

Are all flock images subject to open records request ?

Are we to expect more government surveillance with another system ?

Racine County doesn't like to respond to Open  Records Request.

Patricia Hanson, Sheriff Schmaling, Michael Lanzdorf all are guilty of withholding  records.

 Racine Sheriff leadership is so convoluted that a deputy is now running for the Sheriff's office to clean up the corruption in the department.

Sheriff Schmaling is not leading by example.

An absentee leader is not what Racine County needs or wants.

I wonder if Ralph Malicki signed up for County Executive knowing the elected Sheriff was part time ?

                                  Ralph Malicki

What did Vos promise Ralph ?

The Rodent is trying his hardest to remain relevant after he leaves Speaker of the House  the Chinese Communist Party  (CCP).

boundtothedragon.com

                      Robin Vos - AKA Rodent

And what about the DEI hire Cary Madrigal ?

What happens with her First Responder of the Year award that the Rodent gave her without a valid reason ?

                              Cary Madrigal

Read about her award here:
https://share.google/BR0meVsUc1oLbeJv5

&

Cary's record as captain

racineaccountability.com

The Rodent never responded to open records request asking what information he had that the public didn't.

As it turns out Captain Cary again received an award not earned.

Coming soon, The Racine County land pipeline

Oh, the corruption never stops

And see what's on danecountycorruption.blogspot.com

Clean up the corruption

Vandervestforsheriff.com

      Don Vandervest

HOT has the info.

infoccc.com

hotgovernment.com

EXPOSING HIDDEN TRUTHS

-UPDATED-

MADRIGAL'S  DILEMMA 

IS ALSO THE RINO'S DILEMMA

The deep state has heavily funded Captain Cary's campaign

to keep things status quo.

Captain Cary has great looking two color campaign signs, her campaign was well funded, problem is she is not a good candidate.

The people are awakening.

Lets admit it, Captain Cary is a soft target.

Captain Cary is encourage able, she has easily been lead astray by some very corrupt people that has manipulated her for the deep state's own benefit.

THE RODENT

Robin Vos

Anybody affiliated with Rodent Vos should be considered  

deep state. The Rodent wants to keep control when he is no longer Speaker of the Assembly,  IMHO that's why the Rodent awarded Captain Cary First Responder of the year award without any justification, the Rodent wanted to maintain control of the sheriff office.  Chris Schmaling has been AWOL & not been active on day to day operations for some time.

Captain Cary  has two time  stamps for the same day on 6-3-2026, 

which one is right?  Who changed her time stamp, who authorized vacation, when was vacation scheduled ? So many questions.

Was Captain Cary really on duty when she was called out for campaigning while on duty? 

Do we know the truth?

Do you know the truth?

CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION   

-UPDATED-

https://heyzine.com/flip-book/ab83cddc4b.html

It's now in the hands of  Racine County corporation counsel.

perezforsheriff.us

vandervestforsheriff.com

 EXPOSING HIDDEN TRUTHS

THE CULTURE OF CORRUPTION

Is Racine County plagued with corruption? 

Appears so.

The Racine County D.A. Patricia Hanson refused to charge Sheriff deputy Emil Ortiz with felony misconduct of abuse of the Flock camera systems.

It is alleged the deputy abused the Flock system for personnel use.

You can view the Kenosha Eye article here:

https://kenoshacountyeye.com/2026/07/14/walworth-county-judge-orders-unredacted-police-records-in-ortiz-flock-misuse-probe-after-da-refuses-charges/

Apparently the "county" doesn't want any bad press before the elections that will expose the Sheriff's office as derelict for mishandling disciplinary proceedings against their officers.

According to Deputy Geary, all open records concerning any sheriff candidates working for the County must now be processed thru Racine County Corporation Counsel.

Not only has this slowed down the response time, it has given Corporation Counsel the responsibility & liability of addressing open records request under Wisconsin Statutes ^§§ 19.31-.39 for these candidates. 

Corporation Counsel Michael Lanzdorf sent a memo out on 6-8-2026 to all Racine County employees and contractors titled "Guidance on Political Campaigns" which stated County employees can support & participate with candidates on their own free time, it further went on to be aware of the do's & don'ts when at work.

Sheriff candidate Donald Vandervest freely revealed his records to the public.

Henry Perez openly shared his records.

Captain Cary Madrigal openly shared her records AFTER trying in court to prevent her records from being published. This case was in front of Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz.

Read about it here:

https://share.google/nKQpWeg0DPllWjoGz 

 In all fairness, Eugene got this one right. But he is still known as -

 AKA'  "Gagthebitch", City of Racine "go to judge" & the

"Ad Nauseam" judge.

When I see this sign in someone's yard, I can't help but think a pedo protector may live there, someone that works with the Sheriff office to protect pedophilla?

Is it documented that Captain Cary did not act upon credible evidence that a deputy engaged in deviant behavior while on duty?

 Plus, was Captain Cary campaigning while on duty on 6-3-2026  & using a sheriff issued phone?

Inquiring minds wish to know.

infoccc.com

boundtothedragon.com

hotgovernment.com

racineaccountability.com

ATTENTION CCW PERMIT HOLDERS

Your CCW license records are treated as open records in Racine County

Recent events have exposed the Racine County Sheriff's Office routinely releasing CCW license information to nosey citizens in direct violation of Wisconsin state statutes.

Want to know who is packing heat ? 

Just ask Chris Schmaling or John Harahan or any sheriff deputy in Racine county. 

Scofflaw Schmaling

According to information from a lieutenant within the department, it is within department policy to release CCW licensee information to nosey and inquiring minds. This CCW open records policy of the sheriff's office is in blatant disregard of the law. 

CCW statutes are very specific to protect the privacy and identities of law abiding CCW licensee's.

This is serious folks, The sheriff's office has breached the public trust of Racine County citizens who carry by violating the very laws that are put into place to protect law abiding citizens.

If you live in Ashland or Appleton and want to know who's packing? Call the Racine County Sheriff Office where CCW records are handled as public records.

Your information is not safe and secure due to the scofflaw's Sheriff Schmaling and Deputy Sheriff Hanrahan's interpretation of the law.

A complaint has been directly filed into the Racine County District Attorney's office (Patricia Hanson) and with Racine County Corporation Counsel  (Michael Lanzdorf) seeking an immediate stop to this CCW open records policy of the sheriff department.

CCW law does not provide any relief to the aggrieved, so
the complaint further request the county to censure Schmaling and Hanrahan for their misconduct of office.

Below is from the DOJ frequently asked questions about CCW concerning the access, use and release of information.
Pages 28 and 29 

To view the complete document:
https://www.doj.state.wi.us/sites/default/files/dles/ccw/ccw-faq%201-2018.pdf

ACCESS TO CCW LICENSE INFORMATION

 Will there be a list of persons who have CCW licenses? Yes. 
The law requires DOJ to maintain a computerized record listing the names of and specified information (including but not limited to dates of birth, sex and the identification number of the CCW license) concerning all individuals who have been issued a license and former federal law enforcement officers (but not former state law enforcement officers) who have been issued certification cards. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(a). 

Is the information regarding CCW licenses available to the public? No. 
The information regarding CCW licenses is not considered a public record and the DOJ, Department of Transportation (DOT), or any employee of DOJ or DOT, cannot make it available to the public except in the context of a prosecution for an offense in which the person‘s status as a licensee or holder of a certification card is relevant or through DOJ‘s annual report to the Legislature and the Governor. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(c). 

Does DOJ issue any reports regarding CCW licenses? 
DOJ is required to submit a statistical report to the Legislature and the Governor annually by March 1 of each year. The report must indicate the number of licenses applied for, issued, denied, suspended, and revoked during the previous calendar year. For the licenses denied, the report must indicate the reasons for the denials and the part of the application process in which the reasons for denial were discovered. For licenses suspended or revoked, the report must indicate the reasons for the suspensions and revocations. DOJ may not include in the report any information that may be used to identify an applicant or a licensee, including but not limited to a name, address, birth date, or Social Security number. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(19). 

To whom can DOJ release information on CCW licenses? 
Law enforcement agencies upon proper request and reports to the governor and legislature. 29 Proper requests from law enforcement include: 1) to confirm that a license or certification card produced by an individual at the request of a law enforcement officer is valid; 2) if an individual claims to hold a valid license or law enforcement certification but does not have his or her license document or law enforcement certification card with him or her, to confirm that the individual holds a valid license or certification card; and 3) to investigate whether a person submitted an intentionally false statement in a license application or renewal. Wis. Stat. §§ 175.60(12g)(a) and (19). 

Is the information regarding CCW licenses available to a law enforcement agency?
 Yes, in limited circumstances. A law enforcement officer may not request or be provided information from such computerized record concerning a specific individual except for specified purposes including to confirm that a license or certification card produced by an individual at the request of a law enforcement officer is valid or, if an individual does not have his or her license document or certification card with him or her, to confirm that the individual holds a valid license or certification card or to investigate whether the person made false statements in their license application or renewal. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(b) and (12g)(b). 

How can law enforcement agencies use CCW license information? 
To confirm that a license or certification card produced by an individual at the request of a law enforcement officer is valid. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(b)1a. If an individual claims to hold a valid license or law enforcement certification but does not have his or her license document or law enforcement certification card with him or her, to confirm that the individual holds a valid license or certification card. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(b)1b. To investigate whether a person submitted an intentionally false statement in a license application or renewal. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(b)1c. To investigate whether a person complied with the requirements governing the return of revoked or suspended CCW licenses. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(b)1d. 

Is information available to law enforcement agencies outside of Wisconsin? Yes: 
1) information to confirm that a license or certification card produced by an individual at the request of a law enforcement officer is valid; or, 2) if an individual claims to hold a valid license or law enforcement certification but does not have his or her license document or law enforcement certification card with him or her, to confirm that the individual holds a valid license or certification. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12)(b) 2. 

Are there some things a law enforcement agency cannot do with license information? 
Neither a law enforcement agency nor any of its employees may store or maintain information regarding an individual that was obtained from DOJ based on the individual‘s status as a licensee or holder of a certificate card. Wis. Stat. § 175.60(12g)(b). In addition, neither a law enforcement agency nor any of its employees may sort or access information regarding vehicle stops, investigations, civil or criminal offenses, or other activities involving the agency based on the status as licensees

Once again Sheriff Schmaling as a law enforcement officer has been exposed operating in total disregard of Wisconsin laws that are put into place to protect it's citizens.


 Schmaling doesn't believe he has to comply with the law !

Teach him otherwise!