Veracity

Because it does matter

State vs. Kurt Hanson

To better understand this case, please click

 www.justice4angel.blogspot.com

Once again, RCC focuses its efforts on State vs. Kurt Hanson,

Case # 2014CF001506

The State’s complaint written and submitted by Racine Police Officer Donna Hanke against Kurt Hanson has notable defects, defects that all participating legal parties have been made aware of by RCC.  These defects in the complaint include misinformation, errors, acts and omissions by police on the day of Kurt Hanson’s arrest.

Further, after the arrest of Kurt Hanson, errors, acts and omissions by RPD and the Racine District Attorney’s Office are ongoing.  

Since the second week of November 2014, video evidence of the altercation between Brian Polk and Kurt Hanson has illuminated a defective complaint before the court.  This defective complaint has kept Kurt Hanson incarcerated since 11-04-2014.

The State has not amended the defective complaint in front of the court despite RCC efforts to illuminate the truth, nor has the court acted upon knowledge that was forwarded to the court.

This is one screwed up, convoluted case.

This case has its beginnings as a dog poop incident, dog poop on the grassy area between the street and the sidewalk, called a Parkway;

Technically, the parkway is a part of the Public Right-of-Way, which is owned by the City of Racine, the resident must maintain it as part of the conditions upon which you are granted an easement to access your property and driveway. The part of your driveway in the Public row is called the approach.  Enough legalese!  I am easily distracted.

Back to the beginning according to the filed complaint; a dog pooped on a neighbor’s parkway and the owner of the dog (Kurt Hanson) failed to pick up the poop. The neighbor’s daughter and the dog owner exchange words, the dog owner then kicked the poop out onto the street and went home.  Unhappy with learning of the earlier pooping event, the father of the daughter Brian Polk, walked over to Kurt Hanson’s house to discuss the poop, an armed altercation took place and Brian Polk made tracks back to his home, called police and made a complaint against Kurt Hanson.

Fast forwarding…… hours later, the Racine Police escalated the scene into a lethal act, killing Kurt Hanson’s dog and arresting Kurt Hanson. Officer Donna Hanke then filed the defective complaint that has incarcerated Kurt Hanson for over 4 months.

After Kurt Hanson’s arrest, Officer Donna Hanke’s complaint would stand scrutiny for about two weeks, that is when video evidence of the incident was submitted to the D.A.’s office.  The D.A.’s office now had evidence that the written complaint filed by Officer Donna Hanke bared false witness.

The video evidence changed the dynamics of the case; Polk could no longer be viewed as a victim of an attack as the video evidence appeared to illuminate Polk carrying a weapon onto Hanson’s property. The video evidence further revealed inconsistencies of the complaint, indicating Polk was either obstructing the police and/or the Racine Police Department was in collusion with Brian Polk.

When video evidence presented itself, all participating legal entities had a responsibility to amend the known defective complaint, yet none did.

In RCC’s opinion, the dynamics of the State’s case changed two weeks after Kurt Hanson’s arrest, when video evidence illuminated an armed aggressor (Brian Polk) entering Kurt Hanson’s property.  This is the time when another investigation into the incident should have occurred, but didn't.

The real questions then became who provoked the armed altercation? Who obstructed the police? Did the police conduct a proper investigation? Was there collusion between Brian Polk and the police? How could the police ignore Kurt Hanson’s claim of Polk carrying a weapon onto his property?  A most critical question became - who provoked the armed altercation?  Because of video evidence, we now know that Polk appeared armed when he entered Hanson’s property. We also know that Polk most likely obstructed the police and/or that the Racine Police Department conspired with Polk to place Hanson in jail.

The theory of  a PIG and a POLK  (satire) conspiring against Hanson is very plausible. Hanson isn’t a model citizen; he is known to have issues with alcohol and drugs, is not known to be friendly to police intervention and has a long police record. Being the police has taken no action against Polk despite the appearance of Polk obstructing and entering another’s property while armed suggested some type of consideration, get out of jail free card, or amnesty existed for Polk by the Racine Police Department .

RCC also is aware that the apparent provoked armed altercation by Brian Polk was not considered or investigated by RPD on the day of the incident, we gleam this knowledge from interaction with Racine Police and the Racine Police Department complaint. The Racine Police report makes no mention of Polk being questioned or investigated about having a gun on Hanson’s property, even though Kurt Hanson stated to police on 11-01-2014 that Polk entered and brandished a gun on Hanson’s property.   

The video evidence appears to have illuminated an armed Brian Polk entering the Hanson property with a weapon, just as Hanson had stated on the police report/complaint.

According to the complaint filed into court records, the police report/complaint states that Brian Polk picked up a tree branch to defend himself when Kurt Hanson came outside with a machete. Video evidence refuted Polk’s claims, illuminating no such tree branch event occurred. Video evidence did illuminate Brian Polk posturing himself with what appears to be a pistol, aiming the pistol at Hanson on Hanson’s property. 

Excuse me, who did the police arrest?  

Despite all this video evidence, RPD and the State have not issued Brian Polk a summons and complaint, nor have they amended the known defective complaint.

The Rule of Law is dead in Racine County:

SCR20:3:3

18 U.S.C. § 1503

RCC now asserts that SCR 20:3:3 (Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule – candor towards the tribunal) has been knowingly violated by the Racine County District Attorney’s Office.

A quick overview of SCR20:3:3

Candor towards the Tribunal

·       Don’t lie to the court

·        Must correct past lies of misstatements

·        May not hide controlling authority

·        May not offer false evidence

·       Cannot enable a client to lie or crease false evidence

Further, the Federal crime of obstruction of justice, defined by Section 18 U.S.C. § 1503, to include conduct that among other things, corruptly endeavors to obstruct or impede the due administration of justice appears to have also been violated by numerous governmental agencies and their members. Members that include the Racine Police department, Officer Donna Hanke, Chief of Police Art Howell, other members of RPD, members of the prosecuting agency, the Racine Count District Attorney’s Office and even Judge John Jude.

To understand why we put so much effort into a case that seemingly doesn’t deserve our attention; you only have to click and read about

Click: Martin Niemöller.

First they came for the communists,

and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Catholic.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.

So why do we do this?

Kurt Hanson has been incarcerated since 11-04-2014 by a defective complaint.  Kurt Hanson does not have the financial resources to bail out.   Two weeks after Mr. Hanson’s arrest, the defective complaint was known by government officials to bare false witness. By not correcting the known defective complaint, a larger crime against society has been committed by our government officials.  This is how future Hitler’s get their start when the public does not question or challenge corrupt authority.

Folks these are serious allegations of breaches of ethics and laws by our public servants - by the very people who we should be able to have faith in and trust to enforce the laws. 

Kurt Hanson's trial is scheduled to begin on Tuesday, March 10 at 1:30 PM. 
Will the State proceed with the known defective complaint ? 
Or will the State and RPD come to their senses, restore our faith and seek an alternative path for Mr Hanson. 

Truth is not a choice in government; it is a process of destination