This was posted to wisconsinsupremecourtcorruption.blogspot.com
FYI
EXPOSING HIDDEN TRUTHS
How can a Wisconsin Supreme Court Candidate be so ignorant of the law? Or is Lazar so drunk with power by joining the two other justices in a sham ruling.
What part of the 14th amendment & Due Process doesn't Maria Lazar understand?
The 14th Amendment grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. and guarantees all citizens equal protection of the laws and due process. In simple terms, it ensures that no state can deny a person these rights.
The Court of Appeals is so drunk with power they think they can do whatever they want - they are exposed.
Procedural due process is a constitutional principle that requires the government to follow fair legal procedures before it can deprive a person of life, liberty, or property. This principle ensures fairness by requiring due process of law, which generally includes providing the individual with adequate notice of the proceedings, an opportunity to be heard, and a neutral decision-maker.
3 items clearly come to mind that didn't happen from above
1. Notice of Proceedings
2. Opportunity to be heard,
3. A neutral decision-maker.
NONE of the above happened in case # 2023AP1897-LV
The motion for the case to be heard en banc was denied. Wonder why?........... Its all in the court record.
You can view Racine case # 20PR15 in the WCCA online records here:
https://wcca.wicourts.gov/
Court of Appeals case here:
2023AP1897-LV
Is the Court of Appeals so corrupt & screwed up this Appeals case isn't displayed on WCCA online records? Look it up yourself.
Does Justices Gundrum, Lazar & Gill go to extremes to protect corrupt Circuit Court Judges Cafferty, Flancher & shyster Attorney Thomas Camilli in the corrupt Racine County Court system?
Case #2023AP1897-LV was heard before Mark D. Gundrum, Presiding Judge (P.J.), Maria S. Lazar and Gregory B. Gill, High Court Judge (J.J.)
It is important to note there was no dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals decision and an en banc appeal was denied.
Background:
Judge Lazar was part of a unanimous Court of Appeals ruling that ruled in favor of 2 corrupt Racine County judges who let stand a contested false affidavit filed by a licensed BAR attorney. Racine Judges Cafferty & Flancher with impunity failed hold the licensed BAR attorney accountable for filing the false affidavit, Attorney Thomas Camilli of Kenosha filed the false affidavit with impunity even though it was contested. The case is much more complicated & egregious than what is being presented, but people understand how important veracity must be in the courts as well as rights being protected.
SAY NO TO MARIA LAZAR
We should have a better choice than the lesser of the two evils.
Know your rights, rights neglected are rights lost.
Tyranny warrants civil disobedience.
Be a paper warrior- inflict a thousand cuts.

